[–] PQhonest 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago
ALL of Seth's known accounts must be investigated ASAP. /u/FricasseeingRabbit has posted a thread and reply to this comment with solid info that connects Seth Rich to Bernie and lays to rest any doubt about his motives to leak. (Confirmed) Reddit- MeGrimlock4 (Confirmed) Twitter/Instagram- Panda4Progress (Suspected) Reddit- Pandas4Bernie (Suspected) Twitter- Pandas4Bernie (Suspected) Tumblr- Pandas4Bernie2016
[–] koalapassion 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Colbert has always been a pile of shit, you just couldn't hear him clearly with Johnny Stew's dick in his mouth
[–] Criticalthinker615 1 point 2 points 3 points (+3|-1) ago
Makes me wonder why he picked "panda4progress" as his username. Pandas are used as pedo symbols also arent they?
[–] errihu 0 points 7 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago (edited ago)
Pandas are only pedo symbols to those in the know. To everyone else they are cute, fluffy animals that most of the world adores. That's the problem - most of these animals and symbols are used innocuously by many. I would say if you see a number of symbols together associated with a specific individual or company, then yes, it's probably used as a signal. But honestly, almost all of us thought of pandas as cute animals before the PG stuff broke. And that includes a lot of people who are absolutely obsessed with them.
Could be nothing but, i dont discount anything especially considering how many of his colleagues seem to be pedophiles. I haven't seen anything else from Seth that gives me the pedo impression so, prob nothing but still worth noting
[–] dickface888 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago
Same thing with pizza, hotdogs and tacos etc.
[–] Omnicopy 3 points 3 points 6 points (+6|-3) ago
Rich family surrounded by Disney pictures is a creepy family!!!!! Disney's so cute but sooooo demonic! The world fell for Disney hook line and sinker! It's THE most demonic corporation there is!!! And it deals with kids!!! What does that tell you! Open your eyes people!!!
[–] MolochHunter 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago (edited ago)
interesting, it says there was a second leaker in obvious danger - names by name, but i wont add to his jeopardy by repeating it here
[–] Are_we__sure 2 points -1 points 1 point (+1|-2) ago
I don't see any of his posts that suggest he was the leaker.
Where's the goods?
[–] andycow 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
I think it's circumstantial evidence that people have gathered. Julian Assange's associate who met with the leaker mentioned he was a bernie bro. Seth had access to the database and people are speculating he worked with someone else. The theory right now is he lowered the firewall and his partner hacked the files. I still need to read more but that's my understanding at the moment.
[–] Are_we__sure 2 points -1 points 1 point (+1|-2) ago (edited ago)
The lowered the firewall bit is wrong and I think almost deceptively so.
The reason I say deceptive is if you remember the incident it involved access to the voter information, no the DNC emails and when this happened it was because of a bug in the software, not because the firewall was turned off. The DNC does not create the software. A third party company called NGP VAN does. The issue was both campaign gather voter data that is highly useful is identifying a Clinton voter from a Sanders voter. Both campaigns also have access to previously gather DNC data. During the primaries Clinton team is not supposed to see the data gather by the Sanders team and vice versa. The software has a filter that prevents this. They did a software update where this filter wasn't working and they fixed with within two hours. Then the looked at the logs and the logs showed that the Sanders data guy went and started exporing list after list of state data
http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2015/images/12/18/merged_document.pdf
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NGP_VAN
So nothing about this involved emails. Nothing about this involved a lowered firewall.
They also seem to think Seth Rich recommended the guy who exploited this bug to steal Clinton's data to the Sanders team, but that seems wrong to me. Rich was not the National Director of Data, he was in a lower position. He dealt with data, but the language used almost certainly points to an older, more senior member.
What's your source on this?