I'm mostly curious as to the reason the blog quotes the Vulgate version of Matthew 10:34's second clause. Mostly, I am curious of their exegesis of that scriptural line.
As to the post itself, I have seen most of those points addressed as issues for which they need to develop solutions or for which they already have. I really don't know how you leap from pointing them out to concluding no one will ever go there and there is no reason to do so.
[–] Grospoliner ago
Wrong.