[–] Myrv 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
Here in the US, it would be a simple matter to add the cost of the vehicle as part of the shareholder disbursement.
And I mentioned that in my response to you. If the owner did claim the vehicle as a taxable benefit then I agree with you, it would be a personal vehicle and the "smoking police" don't have a leg to stand on. I get the impression though this wasn't the case. The article merely states the car was registered to the company. It doesn't state what its tax status was.