[–] redditsuckz 4 points -3 points 1 point (+1|-4) ago
If "The Protocols of Molochians" exists it wouldn't be as tame as the Protocols of Zion.
[–] WastedF 2 points 0 points 2 points (+2|-2) ago
. The part played by the Press is to keep pointing our requirements supposed to be indispensable, to give voice to the complaints of the people, to express and to create discontent. It is in the Press that the triumph of freedom of speech finds its incarnation. But the GOYIM States have not known how to make use of this force; and it has fallen into our hands. Through the Press we have gained the power to influence while remaining ourselves in the shade; thanks to the Press we have got the GOLD in our hands, notwithstanding that we have had to gather it out of the oceans of blood and tears. But it has paid us, though we have sacrificed many of our people. Each victim on our side is worth in the sight of God a thousand GOYIM.
[–] garouwarrior 2 points 4 points 6 points (+6|-2) ago
Any and all groups are fair-game at this point. No more political correctness.
[–] Bot117 2 points -1 points 1 point (+1|-2) ago
I have been Looking at voat comments for about a month now. and I can't tell you how many times someone has said something slightly negative or simply negative and the comment gets bombarded with downvotes and little to no upvote even if the comment was pure facts.. for a while I just let it go. but now I feel as if something is wrong. why are people defending the L.G.B.T. so much here on Voat?
[–] Laskar 1 point 2 points 3 points (+3|-1) ago
Who defends pedos? With all the trolling in the comments, no one is focusing on the fact that Bernard, the Dutch banker whose interview was posted on VOAT dozens of times, is the person who said the most important thing to learn about regarding this global pedo thing is to read the Protocols. Saying that the Protocols are a forgery or plagiarism implies an original, so it is disinfo that is perpetuated with silly arguments that have no logic. If any of the hysterical SJWs here credit Bernard with saying any truth in his interview, then it behooves us to examine the Protocols as we would any other lead. Here is a man who is a witness, who was traumatized and who then urges us to read the Protocols and understand. Whining about Hitler, and infantile concern about being PC is way off the issue. The issue is investigation of pizzagate, not concern over what those who are brainwashed think of VOAT.
[–] Mad_As_Hell 2 points -1 points 1 point (+1|-2) ago
Curious reaction to this post. Ronald Bernard cited the same document and people can't seem to get enough of his interview.
[–] rafael5643 [S] 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago
That interview was excellent.
[–] Laskar 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
It looks like children were looking to garner points while posting Bernard's interview over and over, while ignoring what he actually said. The Protocols are a great red pill tool. The arguments saying it is a forgery or plagiarism implies the existence of an original. Certain people are literally outing themselves as those who are behind the suppression of pizzagate.
[–] rafael5643 [S] 2 points -1 points 1 point (+1|-2) ago
It may be a bit longer but you can break it into segments, it is worth it IMO.
[–] bopper 4 points -3 points 1 point (+1|-4) ago
Can you link directly to the blackmail part? I've been trying to plow through this for years now.
[–] rafael5643 [S] 2 points 3 points 5 points (+5|-2) ago (edited ago)
" In order that our scheme may produce this result we shall arrange elections in favor of such presidents as have in their past some dark, undiscovered stain, some
"Panama" or other - then they will be trustworthy
agents for the accomplishment of our plans out of fear of revelations and from the natural desire of everyone who has attained power, namely, the
retention of the privileges, advant ages and honor connected with the
office of president. The chamber of deputies will provide cover for, will protect, will elect presidents, but we shall take from it the right to propose new, or make cha nges in existing laws, for this right will be given by us to the responsible president, a puppet in our hands. Naturally, the authority of the presidents will then be- come a target for every possible form of attack, but we shall provide him with a means of self-defense in the right of an appeal to the people, fo r the decision of the people over the head s of their representatives, that is to say, an appeal to that some blind slave of ours - th e majority of the mob. Independently of this we shall invest the president w ith the right of declaring a st ate of war. We shall justif y this last right on the ground that the president as chief of the whole army of the country must have it at his disposal, in case of need for the defense of the new republican constitution, the righ t to defend which will belong to him as the responsi- ble representative of this constitution."
[–] PeesInPools 1 point 2 points 3 points (+3|-1) ago
Regardless of source or authorship, the Protocols correspond so closely to world events that it would be foolish for even the most casual of red-piller to just write them off. And they're so adamantly banned and condemned by everyone, which is damning in itself. It's a good doc to spread around, to help offer the larger picture for knowing thine enemy (along with other revelation of Satanic/Luciferian corruption). Even if you're an atheist, the enemy is not; they follow a spiritual agenda. Though it doesn't directly offer any substantial, tangible evidence to pizzagate, so take it for what it is.
[–] garouwarrior 1 point 1 point 2 points (+2|-1) ago
In the past, homosexuality used to be the weapon of choice for blackmailing politicians.
Nowadays, well everyone here knows what that is....