[–] monkeytoe101 1 point 4 points 5 points (+5|-1) ago
I love that fucking defeatist reporting "oh but they can just tunnel under the wall" what a piece of shit. It's as though he's saying we should do nothing at all. I bet he has no doors with locks installed at his home either since they can be defeated as well...
[–] SoloPoloVision 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Um, that's Bush's border fence in Sunland Park as authorised by the 2006 Secure Fence Act.
[–] eggmunkee 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago
No this is a picture literally from 1930's Germany guys. I've already heard several different explanations about why this isn't a new wall. You all should talk together and get your story straight, then present a single debunking narrative that provides evidence.
[–] [deleted] 4 points 6 points 10 points (+10|-4) ago
[–] Kathyl 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
You are surely right. This "wall" is an existing piece of construction that the interim budget will pay to replace. These have slats in them so the border guards can see them coming, or so the story goes. I don't know any border guys.
Calling me stupid won't get our wall built, but I feel your angst. What's going on now is complete bullshit.
[–] aria_taint 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
Infrastructure. You can truck in steel and there's no expiration time on it. Concrete plants would need to be built close to the job site, infrastructure built for the plants including power and water, also non stop trucks bringing in aggregate or even train track built to supply it. Massive logistic issue over prefabbed steel which is absolutely cheaper and the wall can go up 10x faster.
[–] Omag 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago
Build it with an opening every so many miles to funnel them to heavily manned checkpoints. Or just set up the surprise, "Welcome to America amigos " bonuses at the gaps