0
0

[–] stegg001 ago 

Is there any reason to take Chelsea Clintons oppinion serious? I mean what has she done except being born in a family where 20 years ago her dad was president.....

0
1

[–] xenoPsychologist 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

is there ANYONE left that isnt aware of autism (or breast cancer for that matter)? raising awareness for things everyone is already aware of is a scam.

0
0

[–] Zbruh ago 

I don't think anyone at all could take on Ben Shapiro on twitter.

0
1

[–] diodine 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Autism coverage? What is there to cover?

t. autist

0
2

[–] Hmmm 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

I swear to all that is good in the world, Ben will one day be president of United States.

2
-2

[–] Brawndosaurus 2 points -2 points (+0|-2) ago 

I hope not. He's not loyal to the U.S. before all other nations.

0
1

[–] WanderingMitten 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Her first twit, isn't that the Democratic Mantra?

0
2

[–] iamrage 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Anyone else smell that? I smell something burning.

0
3

[–] ElementalPee 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Chelsea Clinton is dumb and insufferable, clearly, but I'm pretty sure Shapiro misunderstood what she meant when she said sarcasm didn't translate. The way I read it, at least, was that she was saying Shapiro's possible sarcasm didn't really translate and she wasn't sure what to make of his initial response. It looks like the way he read it though, was that she was trying to backpedal and say she was just being sarcastic but I don't think that's what was going on.

0
4

[–] Wonder_Boy 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Yes, he knew exactly what she meant, but then he used irony to kung fu the crap out of it back onto her. Was really a masterstroke.

0
1

[–] IforgotMYpASS 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

It really was. Because it's on social media, he made it look like she was being sarcastic and flipflopping. It's debating 101.

load more comments ▼ (12 remaining)