scroll up now.. https://voat.co/chat/news both main rooms... not even poetic, either..
[–] 8915582? [S] 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago
yup. but @puttitout's a coward. he'll neuter chat, but not the abusers. he'll steal subs from regular users and ban accounts for 0 votes given, and lie to the userbase about rulesets for magic bans and removes ccp from users' accounts but tells users that will never happen,
but @puttitout would never do something for the benefit of the voat community. that's the opposite of the SJW agenda.
[–] 8915625? 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
when all that is happening it starts begging the question of whether those censorship tactics aren't designed to destroy voat...
they certainly aren't helping..
using -ccp to disallow any un-banned user from commenting is blatant silencing.. just the opposite of free speech..
Until putt updates the chat, block the spammers: https://voat.co/v/ideasforvoat/1787195
Or use the new one which allows user labeling: https://voat.co/v/ideasforvoat/1820471
[–] 8923622? [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
blocking is for sjw retards. literally weak-minded fools who are unable to simply handle moving their eyes down the page. hugboxes are anti-speech. remove the block button. the ability to discern between parody/malicious pretend accounts and real accounts is great, engle! but the rest of it is SJW slippery slope trash. remove the blocking. that's literally you being played by the shills.
[–] 8914974? 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago
Yeah, something really needs to be fucking done about this.
There are anti-spam measures on normal Voat. Why not on Voat chat?
[–] 8914988? ago
because we must allow free speech
[–] 8915039? [S] 3 points -2 points 1 point (+1|-3) ago
^shill!