[–] MinorLeakage 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
The only problem with your comparison is that PETA is actually all about killing dogs, so Michael Vick would be a perfect fit. PETA likes money, and killing dogs. Which I think is Michael Vick's specialty.
[–] GutterTrash 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
It is also as silly as a professor of ethics breaking heads open with bike locks.
[–] Rainy-Day-Dream 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
the fact that the UN still exists given the quality of work they do is the real problem
[–] bikergang_accountant 0 points 8 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago (edited ago)
Both of them are OK with killing dogs. https://www.petakillsanimals.com/
And it's not like the UN is for anybody's rights. So actually both cases fit.
You can't be for women's rights if you aren't for individual rights, because women are individuals.
Also more rapes happen in areas where guns are restricted so you can't be for women's rights and be against gun rights.