0
8

[–] bikergang_accountant 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Both of them are OK with killing dogs. https://www.petakillsanimals.com/

And it's not like the UN is for anybody's rights. So actually both cases fit.

You can't be for women's rights if you aren't for individual rights, because women are individuals.

Also more rapes happen in areas where guns are restricted so you can't be for women's rights and be against gun rights.

0
5

[–] Figbash 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

the UN was created by communists in order to initiate the one world order, for the world to be run by communists. islam is their partner.

0
2

[–] Whitemail 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Sweden should create a rape prevention task force staffed with Muslims and niggers to avoid being rapecist racist.

0
2

[–] MinorLeakage 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

The only problem with your comparison is that PETA is actually all about killing dogs, so Michael Vick would be a perfect fit. PETA likes money, and killing dogs. Which I think is Michael Vick's specialty.

0
2

[–] Tea_I_Am 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Hey, that's insulting to Mike Vick!

0
1

[–] GutterTrash 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

It is also as silly as a professor of ethics breaking heads open with bike locks.

0
1

[–] Rainy-Day-Dream 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

the fact that the UN still exists given the quality of work they do is the real problem

1
1

[–] Mr_YUP 1 point 1 point (+2|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Considering that Michael Vick apologized and straightened his life out after doing time for the animal abuse this analogy is not warranted.

load more comments ▼ (1 remaining)