[–] GIF-lLL-S0NG 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) 3.6 years ago (edited 3.6 years ago)
They must do accounting tricks where they "sell" like $1mm of books that they never print and then give them a 25% royalty payment.
edit:
In his 2016 tax filings made public Monday, the book royalty income was listed at $218,100.
they gave him 21.81% on $1mm and the banksters got their 3%
[–] hypercat 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) 3.6 years ago
Exactly, so if the politician gets in trouble he can claim he had no idea this was happening.
[–] obvious-throwaway- 0 points 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) 3.6 years ago
Actually, I think it's the (((people))) who own them who have the methods down so pat.
[–] GIF-lLL-S0NG 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago (edited ago)
They must do accounting tricks where they "sell" like $1mm of books that they never print and then give them a 25% royalty payment.
edit:
they gave him 21.81% on $1mm and the banksters got their 3%