[–] 8693989? 2 points 2 points 4 points (+4|-2) ago (edited ago)
People need to stop accepting that there is any justification to being ruled. "Elected" or not, they are rulers. Nations and communities should be governed based on liberty alone. What is illegal? Anything that violates the liberty of another human being. All else you are free to do.
War? No. Just a defensive militia and technological defense unit. Highly trained, background-checked, highly paid workers are part of the effort to manage nuclear weaponry and / or any defenses against foreign attacks. If it isn't an attack on us, forget about it.
Taxes? No. You want to use it, pay for it. You don't want to use it, don't pay for it.
Let us rule ourselves or this cycle will continue forever.
[–] BoraxTheFungarian ago
But this is a rich man's world because people love their monies too much.
Money isn't the problem, it is the system money exists within.
What is money? A representation of what you've earned or gained by fortune; but what can it accomplish? It can serve the ends of either enabling one's power over oneself (liberty) or one's power over another (enslavement). Fix the system so that money cannot enable power over others (enslavement) and money or greed are no longer an issue.
[–] [deleted] 2 points 1 point 3 points (+3|-2) ago
[–] ravensedgesom 1 point 1 point 2 points (+2|-1) ago (edited ago)
I appreciated that post some much needed intellectual honesty. We must cut through the deceptions both self maintained and proliferated by the propaganda matrix. I'm tired of just going with the narrative. shit flows downstream anyways.
I agree this attack was some short of leverage .
nobody gets near them unless they are pre-approved.
this is why you should go for 3rd party / independents and never for the same person twice , you have two parliaments and regular elections so send a message . When you are ready to decide for civilian rule and direct democracy (and stop characterizing people with similar or identical interests "mob" ) we can have a debate
[–] go1dfish 4 points 3 points 7 points (+7|-4) ago
Also don't take this to be I told you so, we were all there at some point.
Trump is one persuasive mother fucker too, even this guy bought into it:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=igbBItLemsM
No blame, no shame, just love and r[evol]ution.
[–] EngelbertHumperdinck [S] 2 points 2 points 4 points (+4|-2) ago
Hey go1dfish, I almost pinged you in my post. I figured you might have something to add.
By the way, Molyneux is a 911 gatekeeper, just like his idol, Chomsky. He's like an Alex Jones for intellectuals. Check out his episode entitled, "The 911 Truth Debate, Yes Really!" He debates a guy who is an admitted novice when it comes to 911 truth, and in the process, abandons all his principles and resorts to sophistry. It's like he's a different person altogether. He even cuts the guy off and ends the show with a close minded suggestion that we should just 'forget about 911 because it doesn't matter anyway'.
[–] MaunaLoona 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
His "debate" on free will is even more dishonest, if you can believe it.
[–] The_End_is_Near 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
It was always a reluctant vote anyways. This was a shitty bag of candidates. Rand Paul wouldn't have bombed Syria, but I doubt he would have beat the cunt.
[–] oiseaulibre 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Gary Johnson couldn't have bombed Syria though, because he probably wouldn't be able to find it on the map.
[–] lorlipone 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
Agreed. I'm fundamentally libertarian, but I couldn't have supported Johnson. Dude was just no Ron Paul. I wish someone could talk Tom Woods and Andrew Napolitano into running.