2
-2

[–] 8671310? 2 points -2 points (+0|-2) ago 

Wikileaks earned back some of my trust since the October fiasco. But it brings even more questions to me and i post this in hope someone smarter and more informed will reply. Did Julian stage the whole "im being kidnapped, help pls" thing so he can escape the Ecuadorian place (sorry i cant remember i just had my tooth pulled out and i am high af)? I read a lot since October about whats happening, i saw some pics posted by wikileaks that some now claim they are fake (ex. two armed guys in a black van). Can someone inform me please? Kim Dotcom said, at the time, that Julian is ok and we should stop worrying. If thats the truth, why did they take them so long to post PoL? Why did they attack their own fans and accuse them of causing trouble to Julian's mother (trying to shame people to stop the questions). Pls no shill replies.

0
12

[–] Gorillion 0 points 12 points (+12|-0) ago 

But the problem is that if you centralize it, "legitimize it" in the mainstream sense and give it a source of funding, it immediately makes it vulnerable to manipulation. It has to be an anonymous network of morally and ideologically driven individuals or it won't work. It's defense lays in it's anonymity. It's the most important factor. Assange got his shit pushed in because he was the single public face associated with Wikileaks.

But he's right about "deserves". It deserves it, but it won't get it without destroying everything that makes it effective.

1
1

[–] derram 1 point 1 point (+2|-1) ago 

https://archive.is/yfQCS :

Kim Dotcom on Twitter: ".@Wikileaks deserves to be well-funded, well-staffed & well-defended. In the age of biased media and fake news Wikileaks is a beacon of hope"

This has been an automated message.

3
-1

[–] AOU 3 points -1 points (+2|-3) ago 

For this useless mayo dumpster, Wikileaks is a bacon of hope.