[–] parnellsUprising 2 points 1 point 3 points (+3|-2) ago (edited ago)
http://www.politico.com/story/2017/02/house-staff-criminal-investigation-234714
http://congressional-staff.insidegov.com/l/22830/Imran-Awan
http://dailycaller.com/2017/03/09/suspect-in-house-it-security-probe-also-had-access-to-dnc-emails/
http://observer.com/2017/02/imran-awan-democrat-debbie-wasserman-schultz-criminal-investigation/
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/03/14/plot-thickens-in-probe-house-it-contractors.html
http://nypost.com/2017/03/04/capitol-hill-staffers-probed-for-theft-worked-for-nyc-congressmen/
Do you need more sourcing ? You really should get out of the cave more often bro.
[–] [deleted] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
In an independent study, they found that people who watched the daily show were more informed on politics and world news than people who watched news like FOX. Just sayin, when you are more informed and educated by a comedian then by an actual news show you should really assess where you get your news.
[–] Donbuster 2 points 8 points 10 points (+10|-2) ago
this seems to be the statement that is used to make this claim.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nnlbdgn_qiQ
Note that Comey is saying that russians did not directly give emails to wikileaks, but they still believed the russians did so while acting through an intermediary.
[–] kneo24 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Comey is very careful with his words. He says more than "believe". Using words like "believe" create ambiguity. His words are, "we assess", which indicates the evidence they have leads them to that conclusion on a rational basis. How all of this pans out remains to be seen. Perhaps their assessment is wrong. This is a lot better than the hacking reports which culminated into, "well it looks like Russians because those fingerprints were left behind, but we're not sure why they'd be so damn sloppy about it. So Russia, yeah?"
[–] heygeorge 7 points 6 points 13 points (+13|-7) ago
Precisely, and now we have another post on v/politics and v/all voted up just because Voaters want to believe it without even following the link. Boo.
Bad Voat, bad!
Bad @dietcokehead1, bad!
[–] voats4goats 1 point 13 points 14 points (+14|-1) ago
What, you don't get your trusted political news from ESPN and the like? ;)
[–] im_the_dude_man 1 point 1 point 2 points (+2|-1) ago
They could pick up Colin Kapaernick on the cheap as a field reporter.
[–] [deleted] 1 point 6 points 7 points (+7|-1) ago (edited ago)
[–] fagnig 1 point 1 point 2 points (+2|-1) ago
Because yahoo make ad money when they republish a snippet of "news" within fair use. Your curiosity is making them clickbait bucks.
[–] lord_nougat 1 point 2 points 3 points (+3|-1) ago
Well, yahoo is a shitty enough source already as it is.