0
1

[–] otakkk 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

how many ads has this website

2
1

[–] aileron_ron 2 points 1 point (+3|-2) ago 

And yet the CIA and NAS said they never spy on Americans. Oh and did not spy on Trupm.

0
0

[–] lord_nougat ago 

But they did spy on Trump.

0
3

[–] Gorillion 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Start doing searches via vpn using real cop's names and tying them to crimes or gay dating sites.

0
3

[–] VillaLopez 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

All this is telling me is that a smart person would use a public internet access point and not do this from home.

0
4

[–] djsumdog 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

This was posted in Hackernews a week ago. So the title is very misleading. The police are not asking for all the results of every search from the city. They're asking for all the searches for a specific person, from IP addresses geographically located in and around the city, along with tons of insane information Google probably doesn't have. They're requesting it to help solve an identity theft case that cost a man thousands of dollars.

0
2

[–] cyks 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Inquire google about the victim because the criminal certainly inquired google about the victim. Makes sense. Nothing can go wrong.

0
0

[–] tame ago 

Just from the description there, it sounds no different to "this credit card has been compromised, where else was it used?"

If the guy lives in city A and they're asking about searches from his logged-in accounts originating from IPs in city B, then that sounds like a good way to narrow down where the culprit might be. There's a fair chance it's happening with the consent of the guy whose data's being requested, too, which changes the situation considerably.

0
5

[–] djsumdog 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

I'm not saying it's right, I'm just saying the article title is misleading.

0
6

[–] 8471698? 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

Sooner or later the judge his own google search history will be openly publicized.

1
10

[–] WakkoWarner 1 point 10 points (+11|-1) ago 

It is really amazing how many stupids are in position to take very dangerous decisions like this one. Who is the stupid judge/court members that agreed with this? Did he go to a special school for handicapped persons? Who is responsible to have given him/her such power? Weren't there checks in place to avoid a stupid like this one to get so much power?

0
9

[–] 8Hz_WAN_IP 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago  (edited ago)

I believe this is the retard in question

0
2

[–] Gorillion 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

"Smile"

"Sir, you need to smile for your photo."

"No, that looks like a grimace of pain. Can you try again?"

"Ugh, fuck! Not quite. Uh, once more?"

"Good enough."

0
4

[–] GoBackToReddit 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

That face checks out.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 40 points (+40|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
0

[–] pushthis ago 

why not duckduckgo?

0
0

[–] 8472640? ago 

What happened with ddg?

0
1

[–] revofire 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

That's what the blockchain is for, we need everyone on board though. The blockchain network can handle this.

0
1

[–] whatisbestinlife 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

ask kim.com?

7 replies