1
-1

[–] Millennial_Falcon [M] 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago  (edited ago)

In the thread about these on The-Donald, everyone was pointing out that it's an unverified account, and therefore fake. Flairing as debunked.

0
1

[–] abcdefg222 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Stuff flared as debunked stays up but we can't discuss tre VERY REAL vault 7???????????

2
-2

[–] Millennial_Falcon 2 points -2 points (+0|-2) ago 

I have told you repeatedly: you can post about Vault 7 if you actually discuss the implications for pedogate. I actually WANT to see it discussed, but Vault 7 is about CIA hacking tools, so it isn't automatically directly relevant (which is the standard of Rule 1, and for good reason: this prevents forum sliding).

As for leaving debunked posts, the purpose is so the community can see that the disinfo, which is being spread elsewhere, has been debunked. Also, the community needs to be able to verify for itself that it has been debunked.

0
1

[–] abcdefg222 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Voat is msm'ing us by not allowing discussion of the new leaks.

0
0

[–] derram ago 

0
1

[–] bopper 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Are these his tweets for real, I'm just now seeing these. If real they're pretty incredible.

This is not "debunked" insofar as Bannon did post these on his recent facebook timeline.

0
0

[–] 8331023? [S] ago 

I know there is a typo on the link . Autocorrect

0
0

[–] fogdryer ago 

How do you autocorrect on a phone