[–] crazimal 7 points 22 points 29 points (+29|-7) ago
Since y'all felt it worth wasting half an hour on this old graybeard's talking head presentation, care to explain it in writing?
In other words, justify the claim that Chelsea's book demonstrates HRCs plan to normalize pedophilia.
Pretend we're on dial up or something and can't see the video...
[–] EarthGleaner 1 point 1 point 2 points (+2|-1) ago
Clif is doing important work and the insults don't help.. That said, I hear what you are saying.
[–] peanut_arbuckle 14 points -2 points 12 points (+12|-14) ago
Why don't you put a modicum of effort in yourself and actually listen to what he has to say?
[–] equineluvr 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
The onus is on the presenter to provide attribution. He gave NONE in that video.
[–] Yates 3 points 26 points 29 points (+29|-3) ago (edited ago)
If someone posts a video it is their responsibilty to give a summary and timestamps to important bits. Especially if the video is over 5 minutes long. We are putting in effort on PG and don't have time for distractions, of which lately there have been many in the form of videos by unknowns being posted without explanation or implying they're important PG diggers and need money.
[–] allogonist 3 points 10 points 13 points (+13|-3) ago
I put a modicrum of effort into researching this and the guy's website stinks really strong of tinfoil-hat intentionally janky looking psyop garbage where he blogs endlessly about chemtrails and how it affects the human brain. Here's a short excerpt from HalfPastHuman.com:
Some substances can be used to draw metals out of the human body by various means. These include such things as organic clays of various types, certain forms of mineralized salts, and others. i am of the opinion that the metals within chemtrails will certainly be removed by these more physical methods, but in general the amount of energy put into these would be better served finding a plant based tonic that suited the body. The tonics will be providing the body with assistance at all levels including cleansing, albeit in a more gentle fashion.
The website is also terrible...like it could have been made as a wordpress default template in 30 minutes and would have been 1000% better. This seems like intentional self-sabotage. If what he says is true...then his intent may be to discredit the truth.
[–] TruthTrumps 1 point 5 points 6 points (+6|-1) ago
What exactly in Chelsea's book proves it?
[–] MolochHunter 1 point 2 points 3 points (+3|-1) ago
yersss.... and interesting that in Hilary's defeat they arent promoting the book widely
Its also interesting what he says about projected advertising standards/court cases, I've always suspected izzagate means a civilization wide shift back towards conservative puritanism
for 100 years if someone says a politically correct argument about ANYTHING people will retort "whaddareya, a pedophile?'
[–] VieBleu 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
The problem is going to be what are the witchunters going to do to anyone who listens to a heavy metal band or wears a skull ring - there are people on here who think burning is too good for people who use a 5 pointed star on their Christmas trees.
[–] rail606 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago (edited ago)
Yes but the question is justified because time and time again homosexuals are found to have been abused as children and abuse children themselves. So yeah being politically correct is encouraging deviant behavior. To be honest calling someone a faggot probably helps them more then it hurts. They just aren't seeing the effects across all of society. They can only think of themselves. The transgender movement also needs to eat a dick. It is just pushing deviant behavior on all of us. Normalizing sodomy leading us to Gomorrah.
I guess my end all be all is I don't care if you are gay but do it behind close doors. Don't flaunt the fact that you are a deviant. We should not be encouraging deviancy. There is nothing inherently unlawful about it but it does not need to be encouraged or campaigned for.
[–] rally_in_red 2 points -1 points 1 point (+1|-2) ago
This is very important and encouraging information. I have been following Clif High for some time, he is a well informed guy.
[–] LAquixote13 ago (edited ago)
Since you have been following him, can you tell me of he predicted that Trump would become president?
[–] rally_in_red 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Yes, he did. Among other interviews here is one published 27. october: https://youtu.be/c4ULa63HbNA?t=2m46s
[–] sponiatowski 1 point 1 point 2 points (+2|-1) ago
Thanks for this. It's long but pertinent information. More comments to come as it plays for me.
[–] seeking101 ago
would love to know more about the "between the lines" interpretation he is talking about