0
1

[–] kkkkkkkkkk 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Frontline, PBS Newshour, to an extent BBC

0
0

[–] WhiteRonin [S] ago 

Hmm, I'll try those sources. I can see the BBC being less biased reporting on the US.

0
1

[–] 8305515? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Pretty much since 9/11... If something is happening and you want the dirty truth.. /pol..Yes you have to wade through bullshit but, it's only up to your ankles, cnn I can't touch bottom..

0
0

[–] WhiteRonin [S] ago 

V/pol or r/pol ... I don't do reddit and never have.

Actually, the shit did start with Clinton's second term.

CNN was this election.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

[–] [deleted] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

[Deleted]

0
0

[–] WhiteRonin [S] ago 

Hopefully, Trump might be able to reverse some of the Dem/feminist brain washing in schools.

I also agree on how you gather you news.

But my point is how it's gotten much worded over the years.

0
1

[–] Wahaha 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

I can't really agree on the "no longer", since trusting the news was never a thing someone should do. Maybe there was a time when the news and your personal bias were aligned, though.

0
0

[–] WhiteRonin [S] ago 

News has always been biased.

What I mean by no longer is that the news has over a period of 30 years aligned itself with ??? Paying sources ??? While previously it was more geared towards readership loyalty.

The ultra support of Hillary was blatant paid for news it seemed.

Is it Soros who's paying or are there no professional lobbyist too?

0
1

[–] Wahaha 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Well, what do you expect with readership dwindling because everyone gets news faster from the Internet? Of course they won't pander to you anymore, but to the people feeding them money. These guys are so fucking desperate, they spread lies about some YouTuber allegedly hating jews, just to get some readers back.

0
2

[–] OKythen 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

It never was.

Up until some where during Clinton's first term I can remember that you could basically trust what you saw on the news or in the paper

Bullshit!

The msm has never been trustable.

they have been lying since the invention of the printing press and probably before.

0
0

[–] WhiteRonin [S] ago 

Clinton is Bill and Hillary is Hillary. member came after Clinton IRC.

I saw the decline start in Bill's second term when the shit really started hitting the fan for him.

News has always been biased but it used to be also aligned to its readership which it no longer is.

0
1

[–] IBNSFW 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Waco was when I really started to notice the shit show with the media. Fb, reddit and even voat are just an extension of that same song and dance to one degree or another. My advice is to read from all the angles to form an opinion of what is the most probable, then research based on that opinion with the goal of proving it false as best you can. You may still be incorrect in the end but you will be better informed on the subject than most. In short, never fully trust one source.

0
0

[–] WhiteRonin [S] ago 

The davidians ? Or twin peaks? Are the 2 major Waco news stories I remember.

I agree but my point is how the news has changed from being some what worries about liable to today where it's a FACT but no proof is also mentioned in the story.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
0

[–] WhiteRonin [S] ago 

Tried ... They been bought out too ...

0
1

[–] 8305233? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Perfect time to plug na v/inthemorning https://noagendashow.com

load more comments ▼ (9 remaining)