0
0

[–] Vindicator [M] ago 

g-rated_caucasian96, welcome to Voat, and thanks for posting.

Please look over the submission guidelines in the sidebar to right...this post is on the hairy edge of not satisfying Rule 1 due to lack of supporting evidence. Also, Voat is very different from Reddit...especially culturally speaking. You will want to read this post for an overview -- it will explain the biggest problem with this post. Pandering for upvoates is highly uncool. I am going to leave this up for the moment due to the CNN Leaks digging going on.

However, I would recommend that you remove it yourself and repost without the upvoat request before trolls find it and downvoat it into oblivion. You would also be better off posting it as a Discussion post, so that you can add more than one link -- especially if additional information is uncovered. (You can't edit a "share a link" post). Anything you can link to that will help provide context (who is speaking, when, etc.) would be helpful. Otherwise, this is likely to be removed as belonging in our unsourced speculative sister-subverse, v/pizzagatewhatever.

Posts here on v/pizzagate need to 1) State the premise -- what's your hypothesis and why is it related to Pizzagate (defined as the sexual abuse and trafficking of children by the global elite), 2) Back each claim with a link to a supporting source. Posts that rely on innuendo, that don't source major claims, or that don't demonstrate relevance to Pizzagate will be removed and can be posted in the speculative subverse.

0
3

[–] slickleg64 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Lol still do all that and it gets deleted my Millennial Falcon anyway.

0
0

[–] slickleg64 ago 

0
0

[–] The_Kuru ago 

Shouldn't there have been some context before this clip letting us know who "Tony" is?

1
9

[–] Drnoway 1 point 9 points (+10|-1) ago 

This proves nothing.

0
29

[–] zagreos 0 points 29 points (+29|-0) ago  (edited ago)

No one is claiming that this is proof of anything. It's what is called a 'lead' — some piece of information that one should take note of because it may lead to more substantial information. Leads are worth pursuing because they can often lead to detailed information and this in turn can sometimes lead to new proof and evidence.

We shouldn't discourage people from sharing potential leads because other people may be interested in pursuing them further. That is the nature of a crowdsourced investigation. It is fit and proper for someone to report potentially useful information.

People who say "THAT PROVES NOTHING" are being idiotic. They don't understand how evidence is gathered. When you're accumulating information about something like this, you keep track of small details that ignorant people would look at and say, "This isn't smoking-gun evidence for anything; therefore it must be discarded".

Idiots will also focus on this or that detail in a larger mass of evidence, and consider it in isolation from a wider pattern of information, and then say, "THAT ALONE PROVES NOTHING, SO PIZZAGATE MUST BE FALSE".

Then you have a few ignoramuses who get all discouraged about Pedogate research just because a few leads never turned out to be very fruitful — and this in spite of the overwhelming mass of evidence already gathered in connection to Pedogate. The moment that this or that piece of information doesn't bear any fruit , these people seem to forget about the huge amount of evidence and proof that has already been firmly established. Such people are either very forgetful, or they are shills.

Bottom line: Pizzagate has already been proven. We're now in the process of filling in details.

0
0

[–] Dressage2 ago 

You are so correct! Connect the dots, one at a time. The shills are out and they are sweating. Tic toc, tic toc.

0
2

[–] Googs 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

You need to put all these in the form of a post and the mods should sticky it right at the top.

I would upvote you but I don't have the karma..

0
2

[–] Drnoway 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

You have a point no doubt. Im just so tired or all these smoking guns without any waterproof evidence. I want hard evidence! I know the law enforcement officials have it. If there is no big fish arrests in the next 6 months, there will not be any. Ever.

That recording proves absolutely nothing. Who is talking? To who? Tony is a very common name. Could also be a restaurant or night club.

0
2

[–] DeathToMasons 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Well done sir. I could not have said it better.

0
2

[–] PizzaGate711 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

0
1

[–] JPPennypacker 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Another Tony's Palace in Brownsville TX (and maybe others, just noticed that one on a cursory exam).

https://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome-psyapi2&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8&q=tony%27s%20palace&oq=tony%27s%20palace

1
19

[–] surgeson 1 point 19 points (+20|-1) ago 

Because there's only 1 Tony on this planet, right?

0
9

[–] Azagthoth 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

grrrrreat!

0
1

[–] Psalm144-1 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

LOL Yessssss

1
5

[–] iamthepizzanow 1 point 5 points (+6|-1) ago 

Lol'd. Wait for the threads in caps lock connecting Tony the Tiger to pedophilia.

0
1

[–] gt8h65fg 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

it sounds tony's house

0
1

[–] pepe16 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

No it doesn't. It's clearly Tony's Palace. But a grainy recording will sound different if your headphones or speakers aren't good enough. I have ridiculously good headphones and DAC so I'm pretty sure it's Tony's Palace.

0
3

[–] BackAgain 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Ok............Are we just Assuming its Tony Podesta or is there something I missed?

[–] [deleted] 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
14

[–] BackAgain 0 points 14 points (+14|-0) ago 

Theres a million Tonys in the world

This footage was from CNN in Atlanta I believe. Tony Podesta lives in DC. That's nearly 700 miles away

I just think its silly we hear the name Tony and assume it must be Tony Podesta. And the over emphatic "TO THE TOP" as if this is some ground breaking evidence

load more comments ▼ (4 remaining)