[–] BlackKateMoss ago
Sheana's 5'7" and 280 lbs., BMI 43.8. So don't get too attached to her. She could drop dead of a heart attack at any minute. That's the reality of BMI, y'all.
Note: these hams are staying this sarcastically, while we here at FPH know this is actually true. Sheana ought to start making arrangements.
[–] LazarusLong 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
There are exceptions to BMI, but you'll never have to wonder if they are exceptions or not.
The massive fucking muscles will be a dead giveaway.
[–] theepilepticferret 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago (edited ago)
Hummed and hawed about posting this, but I thought since most of the fatties referenced in the article were 5'7" and so am I so here it goes...
Here's a photo of me and my sister at our third sister's bridal shower. I'm the blonde, she's the brunette. I'm 5'7" and was 130 pounds in that photo (BMI 20.4). The dress I was wearing was a size 4, and I was also 8 weeks pregnant at the time. For reference, my sister is 5'9" and 125 pounds (BMI 18.5) but looks slightly shorter because she was wearing shorter heels and also slouching a bit. Point being, we're both in the normal BMI category.
In this photo the woman is supposedly the same weight that I was, but 7 inches shorter, putting her into the overweight category. Unless you are a moron, I think it's blatantly obvious that this person classifies as "chunky" at the very least.
This one is very obviously obese. You can see it in her face. I know she's making a face, but she's got a chunky face regardless. And of course, the author of this asinine article cites "Boobes!" as its first argument, because that's the first thing these obeasts try to hide behind. Like we say around here all the time: a fatty bragging about having big tits is like bragging about having a speedboat because your canoe is going over a waterfall.
This monstrosity is the same height as me but more than twice my body weight in my original photo. Again, it's making a stupid face, but you can tell that it's got a moonface anyways. Its knees are "innies" because of all the fat, and its got a gunt that it's desperately trying to hide under its skirt. If it looks that fat on the outside, just imagine what's going on with its organs.
Fat has become the norm, so shitladies like me & my sister are classed as "anorexic" while cows like the above are deemed "normal". Obeasts think that unless they're on "My 600 Pound Life" there's nothing wrong with them and they're not fat. It's only when you put them next to women with a healthy BMI that they realize how disgusting they truly are.
ETA: didn't even see the porker in the mirror on the right in the last photo. Holy shit
[–] Twodivinehipsters 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
LOL I doubt the girl at 5' 130 lbs is a size 4. Someone in the comments claimed to be a size 4 at 5'2" at 137. I'm 5'2.5" and I call bullshit. I would feel awful at that weight.
[–] hams_have_diabeetus 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
Lol. Wow, that blew up in her face
[–] Deathstalker 2 points -2 points 0 points (+0|-2) ago (edited ago)
The people that bitch about BMI because "it doesn't account for muscle" are always the people who have never touched a free weight or worked a labor job. BMI was designed mid industrial revolution when machines were not doing as much work for us. If anything BMI needs to be updated for sedentary lifestyles.
Edit: Underweight or not, look at that skinnyfat turkey neck. Yuck!
It's like the female equivalent of this aka IIFYM bod.
[–] 8131341? 0 points 9 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago
There is no fat hate here.
Skinny fats are not fats.
They show some restraint in not shoveling food into their faces all the time. They don't smell and most likely don't walk around with massive (tee hee) entitlement taking much more than their share.
Some people don't work out. It is just not a priority for them. If they are not fat they are good.