[–] rightwingcirclejerk 9 points -7 points 2 points (+2|-9) ago
Yeah. It's called DEMOCRACY and Freedom of Speech.
Sux, doesn't it.
[–] Gorillion 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
No, dummy. The point isn't the speech, it's the privileged platform she speaking from undercutting it.
The question "Why doesn't she shut up" = "Why doesn't she understand everything she says is tainted by the very platform she's speaking from?"
She's done literally nothing for herself her whole life. Made nothing. Built nothing. Nothing that wasn't given to her for free and without struggle.
[–] ZYX321 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago (edited ago)
No one is blaring Chelsea over the loud speakers preventing anyone from sleeping at night. Chelsea is as free to speak as anyone else. It's other people who are making the decision to rebroadcast her. If it weren't for Voat, I wouldn't know that Chelsea Clinton was even a thing still. "But you need to be informed so that-" and that's the exact same defense any news outlet would make. The more attention you pay to it, the more money there is to be made in rebroadcasting what she says.
You're right. It is freedom of speech. And freedom of the press. Don't know why anyone downvoated you for that. (Except I do)
[–] DietCokehead1 [S] 0 points 9 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago (edited ago)
No one is questioning her right, we're simply cringeing at the fact that the Clintons still don't get that the people sick of them. It's just plain sad that they're so full of themselves that they can't take a fucking hint.