[–] ShinyVoater 2 points -1 points 1 point (+1|-2) ago
The only argument in your favor is that the misleading headline is taken directly from the article; if you'd chosen this title yourself, you'd be unable to claim it was anything but deliberately inaccurate editorialization. Whether or not I read the article has nothing to do with a defect in your post.
[–] Thisismyvoatusername 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
The fact they haven't made it legal to run over pedestrians doesn't mean they shouldn't do so. I think it would be good for the economy, personally.