0
1

[–] Phenomenonanon 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Interesting theory

0
1

[–] Leto_Atreides 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

I cannot find the resurfaced FBIAnon posts, as they were taken down from /pol. Does anyone have a backup?

0
0

[–] party1981 [S] ago 

The first link to r/conspiracy in the original post above should have it within its text.

0
1

[–] flyingcuttlefish 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

I think this idea of "Hillary leaving the country" is from a headline in The Globe (tabloid)

http://www.globemagazine.com/content/clinton-stopped-her-tracks

. . . so that seems like fiction for supermarket readers.

0
0

[–] party1981 [S] ago 

Right. I do not trust that story. But the Bahrain connection is very intriguing.

0
1

[–] DarkMath 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

The claim Hillary Clinton was stopped at the airport is horse shit.

0
1

[–] party1981 [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Yeah it's from a tabloid, so I don't trust it at all.

0
1

[–] derram 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

https://archive.is/MDiXt :

Breaking Report: Pizzagate / Pedo Crackdown May Be Happening Today - Clintons allegedly apprehended, with Hillary trying to leave the country : conspiracy

https://archive.is/L3UuE :

A NATION CHALLENGED: THE VAULT; Below Ground Zero, Silver and Gold - The New York Times

This has been an automated message.

0
0

[–] Slug_Thug ago 

"''The removal of the contents was not a priority for us because we've always known it was safe and secure,'' Ms. Agnew said."

That line in the NY times article struck me, when it was talking about why they took their time finding and emptying their vaults in the basements of the towers.

1
0

[–] 7960712? 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

Not sure if this has been said already, but what if we parlay the "wiki leaks has been compromised" "conspiracy" (I think there's way more evidence for this than to call it that, but nevertheless it hasn't been proven) and say these 9/11 tweets are a coordinated act to smear WL's reputation? Just like the shills that come in here and say wacky shit to discredit the rest of us? What better way to destroy WL than to align them with "9/11 was an inside job" conspiracy theorists ?

Note: I don't have anything against 9/11 theories. It's almost certain our govt knows things we don't. I'm talking about the bigger public opinion and how they tend to regard 9/11 CT people as "nut jobs". It would be easy to sabotage WL by having them release a story that's later proven false. (Which they've never done)

0
0

[–] samhara ago 

I felt Wikileals was bullshit from the start since most things that are public knowledge, if you bother to check, and obvious - they never bring up.. Assange never even spoke out against the bogus "War on Terror" money - pit proxy war. Webb does admit they were not for the good of U.S. Yeah, the whole "terror war" was fabricated.

Also Assange was brought up and likely sold from a pedo cult. Anne Hamilton - Byrne "The White Brotherhood"

My take on the latest side - swipe by Webb against so - called "9/11 Conspiracy Theory" [lol] is that whoever they were blackmailing, gave in.

0
0

[–] party1981 [S] ago 

Yes, this is exactly what George Webb suggested - we have no JA proof of life.

0
0

[–] 7953551? ago 

underground vaults with valuables that were raided

I think "salvaged" might be a more accurate term unless you cite a source that the gold was stolen

1
-1

[–] party1981 [S] 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

I don't have smoking gun proof, but if you watch building 7 being demolished, in controlled demolition, you see that that it was some kind of inside job..

0
1

[–] 7954414? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

I'm not making any claim whether or not it was an inside job. I'm talking about the gold recovery. There was no evidence it was stolen.

0
0

[–] samhara ago  (edited ago)

I studied it for over 10 years intensively. The government / Media story is 100% bullshit.

But this "Bld. 7" meme is total red herring.. "Bld 7" was demolished / brought down by its leaseholder Mr. Silverstein. He total the story himself on TV.. So they get the mainstream truthlings to repeat "Bld. 7" over and over as if it were evidence ; when it is not evidence.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-jPzAakHPpk "the smartest thing to do is to pull it. "

It wasn't hit by anything..Yes, it was demolished. The owner admitted it. That's no evidence.. How did they fool those suckers to repeat "bld 7" on and on for so many years.. Phew.

Read a good on the subject why don't you? https://www.abebooks.co.uk/911-Conspiracy-Scamming-America-James-Fetzer/14096480640/bd They got everyone to repeat the worst evidence.. How did they do that?

load more comments ▼ (5 remaining)