Mossad is not a police force. It's a secret intelligence organization, parallel to the CIA.
The problem with your theory is that it doesn't help the United States to spend $5 trillion fighting and destroying Israeli's enemies in the Middle East: Iraq, Yemen, Somalia, Sudan, Iran, etc. But it makes perfect sense for a small country, with a high IQ, surrounded by enemies and threats, to ramp up Muslim false flags to rally the U.S. military to help protect it.
The other problem is that 9/11 happened after the heavily Israeli neoconservatives got into power. That indicates that Israel was controlling the U.S., not vice versa. If the U.S. was just hiring Mossad to pull off 9/11, you don't need to fill your federal government with Israeli-connected neoconservatives.
Nobody is saying that "the Jews did it" or that all Jews are bad. We're saying that Mossad is corrupt, the same way that the CIA is corrupt, and Mossad did 9/11, with the permission of neocons. Of course, there are Skull and Bones, Wall St., and secret society connections (Rothschild). But the evidence for Mossad doing 9/11 is overwhelming. Not just executing it, but planning it for decades, and planning it for obvious motivations that benefit Israel.
It doesn't matter what you believe "makes sense" It matter what really happened. I can tell you haven't read the citation. - http://www.septemberclues.info/historical.shtml -
[–] samhara ago (edited ago)
It's impossible for the "Mossad" to do 9/11 without the U.S. government. "The Risk of Winning: What Happens Once the 9/11 Sewer Opens Wide?" - https://nomoregames.net/2006/04/09/the-risk-of-winning-what-happens-once-the-911-sewer-opens-wide/ -
We are fighting a proxy war in the Mid - East not for the ostensible "Israelis" but for the British and German Zionist Bankers.
The "theory" as you call it, of "Israel " in charge of the U.S. is truly a Tail-Wags-the-Dog scenario. Here's from a Cabinet member of the Bush Admin: Morgan Reynolds, link above - from 10 years ago.
[–] party1981 [S] ago
There was U.S. government involvement. I never said there wasn't. So, right off the bat, you are not accurately representing my view.
Your long quote doesn't refute anything I have written here, nor does it address the higher-level arguments I have made for Israeli motivations.