Condensed bombs, massive fireball, radioactive residue.
So a uranium bomb basically.
I believe they were real nukes only because the science is pretty clear here. Occam's razor literally comes into effect.
The big picture of evidence and scientific theory supports the atom bomb idea.
It just a uranium cap in a rifles chamber hitting a uranium anvil. It's a heavy element. It release energy in the form of a big shockwave and fireball with a br of radiation. It wasn't that big. Mostly heat energy, fireball, fire. Most Hiroshima building were weak construction.
As for H bombs, I mean, the bikini still footage might be fake. Who knows?
[–] FuckReddit69 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago (edited ago)
If your going the "occam's razor" route, you have to at least use it right.
Occam's razor actually suggests that nukes were/are hoaxed in order to give a super power more perceived power and to end wars before they start. The science might be there but that doesnt make nukes real and practical.
If you look at the whole story of the Manhattan project, everything just screams BS. Its a nice fairy tale happy ending that turned out just swell for the Allies. Convenient they had Freemason Einstein solve their Nuclear dilemma on the last minute, constructed a Hyper-bomb with said science and won the war for them with just 2 drops. Occam's razor suggests that its way cheaper and easier to just hoax the thing instead of actually building it using untested cutting edge experimental physics.
Almost everything we were taught about WW2 is complete shitbull. From Hitler to the holohoax, you have been spoon fed garbage since your pre-k ball-Earth indoctrination began before you can even say MaMa.
It's entirely plausable, even probable that the Nuke hoax was carried out as one of the biggest successful psyops in human history. Governments lie with impunity to perpetuate whatever agenda they have on the table. It really shouldnt be a surprise to you or anyone even remotely awake.
It's possible, but I've studied college physics and seen tons of Hiroshima evidence first hand. That uranium can make a nuclear reaction, and that the allies could have had one (Hiroshima bomb is not big deal, pretty small a-bomb) is not unreasonable and fits the existing evidence strongly.
The fake chimneys at Auschwitz are different.
[–] boysforsale81 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Sigh, I wouldn't put it past them........
[–] bopper 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Fearmongers.