0
4

[–] 2impendingdoom 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

The LBJ mistress videos on youtube (she had a son with him) lays the JFK backstory all out. Why this happened in Texas is not coincidence.

0
4

[–] witch_doctor1 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

I'll check him out. Yeah, obviously JFK...I'm no fan of the Kennedy's (mainly because of Teddy, the only one not worth shooting)...but I watched a JFK speech on YT recently and damn...he would be way too conservative for any party right now. How far our politicians have fallen is stunning.

0
2

[–] party1981 [S] 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Ted Kennedy gave us the 1965 Immigration Act.

0
1

[–] IPleadThe2nd 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

I never thought too much of JFK either until I listened to some of the last speeches he gave and learned that his last executive order was to create our own currency and essentially end the fed. He was killed right after and guess what the first EO his successor signed? To undo JFKs EO. I think he was a part of their club, but for whatever reason he woke up or had a change of heart. He tried to save us from our enslavement and they killed him.

0
3

[–] bopper 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Some of the "JFK to 9/11" is a little off, on Kennedy. For a great history lesson take a day or two, if so inclined, and watch at least the first several hours of Evidence of Revision. Rare footage you won't see anywhere else.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BHb5X3fFhPw

0
1

[–] party1981 [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

It's the only JFK video I've seen - never looked into it before, so I had no way to vet it. Completely blew my mind. Multiple snipers, Mark Lane, body switching. It seems so obvious in hindsight.

0
3

[–] bopper 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Yeah I tell everyone always go back to the beginning, start w/ Mark Lane. Later move on to the autopsy. There was indeed a casket switch but officer Tippet being used as a double is demonstrably wrong. It gets deep. Research the autopsy. It is well-documented by Douglas Horne and others.

0
2

[–] Fateswebb 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

That stuffs cool I'm not saying it's not, but let me show you this short video

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=1aUM9QQXrDY

Best part is around 1:15 This Blevins guy is awesome and he has spotted shooters in the Nix film. (Standing behind zapruder)

There was at least one more shooter that can be seen in the lense flare of the zapruder film. But also the zapruder film was edited in big ways.. here is a video that proves this.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=PNsrGgyoIgo

Anyway these were some of the newer analysis I have seen that I found interesting. Seems to be actual physical proof to me that of course Oswald story is bs.

0
1

[–] samhara 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

People have been working on it for over 50 years, non-stop.. There are a lot of false "gateways" - It was super - designed, and the Intel pulled out all the stops for the cover-up, psy-op and mind control to get the public and younger generation to believe their stupid "Roger Rabbit" narrative.. The term "conspiracy theorists" was revealed to have been invented [via a FOIA request] by the Intel to dis-credit skeptics.

0
0

[–] samhara ago  (edited ago)

So you are not going to catch up on it all in one afternoon.. There are 3 books from the '90's that are basically definitive.

FUNNY! THE LINKS ARE BANNED BY voat / So you will just have to google the titles. I also just got blocked from doing a search, by Google..which happened once before, i.e. yesterday. If there is nothing to hide, why censor? Lucky there are alt search engines available.. Somdbody's scared?

"Murder in Dealey Plaza: What We Know Now that We Didn't Know Then "

**Assassination Science : Experts Speak Out on the Death of JFK ** & **The Great Zapruder Film Hoax: Deceit and Deception in the Death of JFK **

0
0

[–] samhara ago 

Chris Bollyn is not for real [ you will find many 'controlled op' along the way "What I Finally Understood" - http://mileswmathis.com/guru.pdf ] though he could be an alright "entry drug" into the study of "9/11." JFK may not be the close - to "Saint" people have been led to believe "If only he lived. If If If " Not. [Start with Lincoln to get a grip on the Kennedy ] Lincoln - http://mileswmathis.com/lincoln.pdf - JFK - http://mileswmathis.com/barindex2.pdf -

0
0

[–] party1981 [S] ago 

Can you give me a specific reason why he isn't real (whatever that means?)?

He says 9/11 was Mossad, same thing that FBIanon said. Or you don't agree with FBIanon either?

0
1

[–] samhara 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

What I just wrote on another thread which speaks to the question :

"I don't agree with the YouTube vid I linked above - It claims Israel is behind it which is not true.. There are many nationalities involved. The "Neo-Cons" are not Jews, but belong to their own cult which is gay [homosexual] and secret.

Whoever made the vid is trying to blackwash the info as "anti - Semitic" Truth is I think England Bankers and German Bankers are much more behind it than "Israel" [Palestine] Truth is : England royals and English created "Israel" and Zionism. English Jews.. Honestly many alleged "Jews" are not practicing and believing Jews, but have some other allegiances. I'll try to find a better vid but its not easy with my site gone."

The historic "Israel" is not even where they are telling you.

0
1

[–] samhara 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Of course people in our own government are going to blame it on "Israel" and the Mossad.. Mossad is very good at what they do, so they definitely needed Mossad for this.. It's also true some people who attend and sing at Syanagogue were given a tip not to go to work that day. The event was very long in planning.. Certainly the entire "Octopus" was involved. Rockefeller for certain. Bush, for certain. Here's one of the best text on "Who Did It" - http://www.septemberclues.info/historical.shtml - I have another list too.

0
1

[–] samhara 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Mossad was involved, no doubt.. but were not the top planners. It's was likely out-sourced to them

Bollyn did not keep up with the research. He dropped out 10 years ago. When he came back it was the same bullshit; he had taken it no where. And he's on about "the Jews" this "the Jews" that.. And that is "blackwashing" .. I just wrote something about that "Jew Question" and I will copy and paste here. He also attacks good researchers.. I pay no attention to him since I already wrote him off years ago and do not trust him.. Him and Robert Steele..

0
0

[–] JoJoVoat ago 

I started watching this past weekend.... May try to finish it today. Very very interesting tho and very well put together