0
5

[–] IPleadThe2nd 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

I'm so happy that I get to down vote you now!

0
2

[–] nomorepepperoni 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Make this two votes. Please present something a little less of the ad-hominem, misleading-to-us "sex ring" tabloid fodder variety if you're going to imply concerns about Stone.

1
0

[–] AreWeSure 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

I'm not making an ad-hominem argument. And him being a swinger isn't the one I would use. The fact that the guy is has told us over and over and over again that he is a professional bullshitter is the one I would use. I not even responding to what he said. You guys want to believe Alex Jones and Roger Stone go right ahead.

I'm genuinely curious because I seen the term pervert thrown around here and some folks seems to be intensely religious and anti-sex. I've also seen the term cuck from time to time.

What do you mean about misleading to us? Stone eventually admitted the story was true in a new yorker article from 2008. (Oddly enough at the time of the article trump was feuding with stone.)

0
2

[–] AreWeSure 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

So we have about 5 votes on what consenting adults do is their business.

0
1

[–] stellarcorpse 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

hey if your Scott C like a birdie told me. What do you care? Your a swinger 2. Prob a lot more Mr. BUTT.

0
0

[–] nomorepepperoni ago  (edited ago)

By "misleading to us", I mean the juicy headline touting a "group sex ring", which could easily be mistaken here at first glance for the kind of "sex ring" most of us think of when browsing this sub--one involving kids.

For the record, I'm skeptical about Roger Stone AND Alex Jones.