[–] GoogleistheNSA 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Nice post.
[–] 1WinfieldBlue 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Your Biblical troll game is weak
[–] SoldierofYAH [S] ago
I'm not trolling. I genuinely believe what I'm saying, and am trying to share the truth with others.
[–] Frenchgeek 3 points 0 points 3 points (+3|-3) ago
And why should people listen to your imaginary friend?
[–] SoldierofYAH [S] ago (edited ago)
There must be a supernatural ("spiritual") realm and a Higher Power. The physical universe is finite (in time an space). Even secular scientists admit that the physical universe had a beginning. It cannot have existed forever, or else it would be in an infinite state of disorder, per the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics. Therefore, SOME "force" or "entity" must have caused the physical universe to come into existence. That "entity" is the Creator or "God". You can logically deduce that the Creator is infinite (not constrained by time or space, or other laws of the physical universe), has exited forever, is all-powerful, and knows the future (existing outside of time).
[–] Frenchgeek ago
You are trying to link two unrelated subjects : The fact that current data show the universe as having a beginning and your belief in a creator.
Our currents theories on the origin of the Universe don't need a creator to work. ( A simple local fluctuation of energy in the Void do the trick quite nicely )
[–] ultranationalist 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Lack of one thing does not imply the existence of the other.
Some force, sure. Some entity? Why?
Why one God and not infinite? What's the sufficient reason for there to be just one Supreme Being? And if one can become Supreme why can't all? Doesn't that seem unjust to you? What did God do to deserve the honor of being Infinite and Transcendent? One other thing, I believe the world begins from scratch - from zero -, not from infinity (God). What's your answer to this?
[–] 9-11 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
this sounds like a rule 2 violation.
[–] ItsTheKikes 4 points -2 points 2 points (+2|-4) ago
No it isn't. Religion is not to the right of atheism. Let's separate Church and State, that seems to have worked OK. Because you're NEVER going to convince those of us who took the Red Pill on Jesus AFTER being raised Christian but reading Dawkins, et al.