0
0

[–] SoldierofYAH [S] ago 

Not "our" theories. They are JEWISH theories. And they are completely unsupported by any evidence or logic.

0
0

[–] Frenchgeek ago  (edited ago)

Beyond a mathematical analysis of the origin of black holes with a logical extrapolation to the Universe itself with the background radiation of the Universe being an exact match with the evidence expected from the equation thus created, you mean?

Maths isn't logical enough and a literally universal microwave radiation found anywhere one point a radiotelescope at isn't evidence enough, apparently... ( Most of the static one can hear on a radio, or see on an analog TV, are remnants of the big bang itself )

0
0

[–] SoldierofYAH [S] ago 

It's all THEORY. Supported by mathematics that can be easily manipulated/doctored and falsified to support the theories. That's all Einstein's garbage theory of relativity is. It's nonsense.

0
0

[–] 9-11 ago 

Why is it that you think anyone buys into your current theories that admitted cannot begin to explain the period prior to the 'big bang' when space, matter, and time did not exist? Considering they are untestable and nonsubstantiated by empirical evidence, and assuming you are a believer in the scientific method - You shouldn't believe them either.

0
0

[–] Frenchgeek ago 

The Void is a mathematical construct from the extrapolation of the equations describing the Universe as a black hole ( in matter of its life cycle at least ) : it is the surrounding "element" of the hypothetical point where everything started.

Later experiments in quantum physics have shown a void can experience local fluctuation in energy ( while the net amount of it in the whole system remain zero ), which make the virtual origin point a workable possibility.

The same equations describing hte expansion of the Universe and thermodynamics described a point where the Universe was containg nothing but light ( photons are so simple they came first ) and since there is nothing for that light to disappear to and since it also was freaking everywhere, adding to it the effect of the expansion of the Universe ( currently measured by the doppler effect on nearby and not so nearby galaxies ) we concluded, still using raw unfiltered maths, a global radio background energy of a very specific power and frequency.

AND WE FRIGGING FOUND IT EVERYWHERE WE LOOKED.

So to answer your question : We tested it by testing the consequences of it and not finding alternate explanations that fit better the data.

0
0

[–] 9-11 ago 

Later experiments in quantum physics have shown a void can experience local fluctuation in energy

conveniently already with an x,y,z space existing and time ticking away already. The experiments you speak of showing the quantum fluxuations are only possible for brief instants under specific conditions and have demonstrably shown that the larger the mass the briefer the existence, not the other way around. This essentially destroys the entire theory that you seem to be taking on "faith alone".

equations of thermo and expansion of the universe

you cannot use empirically derived formulas to prove anything. I'm not anti-science, i tend to think the evidence of the CBR does in fact show the early expansion of the universe, but you are specifically talking about the "time" before the big bang when time literally didnt exist, not to mention matter, or the xyz plane of space.