Don't support what Trump is doing, so of course I don't support what Kuwait is doing. It's so counter-productive and ineffective; especially considering that it doesn't ban immigrants from Saudi Arabia and the UAE, which, statistically speaking has produced more terrorists.
[–]Jixijenga3 points
0 points
3 points
(+3|-3)
ago
Oh fuck off, if you disagree with somebody downvoting is not the proper response. That's what reply is for. Downvotes are for bad people doing bad things.
[+]7868945?0 points1 point1 point
ago
(edited ago)
[–]7868945?0 points
1 point
1 point
(+1|-0)
ago
(edited ago)
There is a new king in Saudi Arabia who better understands the problem things like ISIS are creating on the world stage (and isn't interested in attacking the US like the Saudi king of 2000 and 2001), and he is already working to make safe zones for the Syrian refugees in his country, which is a far better proposition than making them flee to Europe or the US.
The counter I've seen to this time and again is that Saudi Arabia and UAE are at least able to enforce law and order. The countries on the current no immigration list are lawless failed states with no way of providing accurate records on potential immigrants and thus are unable to properly vet their exiting citizens. As shitty of a country as S.A. is, they are no slouches when it comes to crime and punishment.
[–] greymanbomber 2 points 3 points 5 points (+5|-2) ago
Don't support what Trump is doing, so of course I don't support what Kuwait is doing. It's so counter-productive and ineffective; especially considering that it doesn't ban immigrants from Saudi Arabia and the UAE, which, statistically speaking has produced more terrorists.
[–] 7870504? 2 points -1 points 1 point (+1|-2) ago
He wants to negotiate safe zones win thoes countries why would he piss them off, you stupid faggot
[–] 7868945? 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
There is a new king in Saudi Arabia who better understands the problem things like ISIS are creating on the world stage (and isn't interested in attacking the US like the Saudi king of 2000 and 2001), and he is already working to make safe zones for the Syrian refugees in his country, which is a far better proposition than making them flee to Europe or the US.
[–] greymanbomber ago
Honestly, it is kind of moot when the kingdom is actively promoting an ideology across the Muslim World (Wahhabism) that creates groups like ISIS.
[–] PepeDidNothingWrong 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
The counter I've seen to this time and again is that Saudi Arabia and UAE are at least able to enforce law and order. The countries on the current no immigration list are lawless failed states with no way of providing accurate records on potential immigrants and thus are unable to properly vet their exiting citizens. As shitty of a country as S.A. is, they are no slouches when it comes to crime and punishment.