2
5

[–] jbdigriz 2 points 5 points (+7|-2) ago 

So...was she the AG when Obama put a 6 month freeze on refugees in 2011?

If so, this is just another political move for show. She was going to be replaced anyway, so this is a show of loyalty to the powers opposing Trump. Makes a nice news story for them.

And even of she wasn't, this still reeks of hypocracy and showboating.

6
-6

2
3

[–] PizzaGate711 2 points 3 points (+5|-2) ago 

The Acting AG was an Obama appointee and was still working for Obama - not Americans. Obama is setting up a shadow government. Most likely she'll end up working now in Obama's shadow government. Obama Setting Up Shadow Govt. https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/civil-unrest/obama-setting-up-shadow-government-civil-unrest-will-lead-to-civil-war/

4
-2

[–] AreWeSure 4 points -2 points (+2|-4) ago 

That's a load of shit on many, many levels.

She was the acting Attorney General because she was asked by Trump to serve as acting AG. She was a member of the DOJ since the 1980's when Bob Barr hired her. You should look up Bob Barr.

She took an oath to the Consitution and working "for Americans" as you put it.

0
2

[–] PizzaGate711 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Be sure about this. Yates WAS an Obama appointee. And angry shills are awfully transparent.

0
0

[–] PizzaGate711 ago 

Why do you think Trump sacked her again?

0
1

[–] Drnoway 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Oh come on. Obama is shadow governments puppet.

3
-3

[–] Gone20 3 points -3 points (+0|-3) ago 

Omfg our president literally threw a temper tantrum. We're so fucked.

0
2

[–] sunajAeon 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Glad to hear this Obama puppet fired-good riddance

0
2

[–] waxdino 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Mother Jones, really? You know they are funded by Soros? Named after a woman that hated the rich, now funded by Soros, Clinton mouthpiece.

0
0

[–] sunajAeon ago 

Like to see documentation on that very interesting assertion

0
1

[–] waxdino 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Made a post about it. Here you go: https://voat.co/v/whatever/1606533

0
2

[–] bopper 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Who is the man That would risk his neck for his brother man? (Shaft!) Can ya dig it? Who's the cat that won't cop out When there's danger all about (Shaft!) Right on You see this cat Shaft is a bad mother (Shut your mouth) But I'm talkin' about Shaft (Then we can dig it) He's a complicated man But no one understands him but his woman (John Shaft) sorry i couldn't help it

0
0

[–] AreWeSure ago 

That song does not apply to Trump. There's only one possible President that song could apply apply to.

That's right. I'm talking about TAFT!

0
0

[–] bopper ago  (edited ago)

He was Skull and Bones. (That was funny, maybe I need to read up on Taft, or not.) If you know Shaft you are showing your age, I saw it a drive-in.

0
1

[–] AreWeSure 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

The Lawfare blog finds Yates's statement unpersuasive. She doesn't say why it isn't lawful. https://www.lawfareblog.com/quick-thoughts-sally-yates-unpersuasive-statement

Another writer on that site says given the above, she shouldn't have refused to defend the executive order, she should have resigned. https://www.lawfareblog.com/quick-thoughts-sally-yates-unpersuasive-statement

0
0

[–] AreWeSure ago 

Video of Senator Sessions questions Sally Yates during her confirmation https://twitter.com/staffernews/status/826285057090453505

load more comments ▼ (7 remaining)