0
0

[–] Terrorist [S] ago 

Obviously.

Why is it a bad thing?

Because it's a massive conflict of interest. Trump is only appointing these people to dismantle the EPA because he doesn't believe in climate change. Or if he does he just cares more about money. They aren't there to improve things.

0
0

[–] guinness2 ago  (edited ago)

Trump is only appointing these people to dismantle the EPA because he doesn't believe in climate change.

That sounds like a standard Huffington Post or Salon news header, however it's fake news.

However, Trump has never said he doesn't believe in climate change: he's critical of the multi-billion dollar climate-change industry and the findings of the scientists who have their funding continued if they get the "right" results, however what you said is garbage.

Why do you think we shouldn't be critical of climate change claims?

Is it too sacred to question?

0
0

[–] Terrorist [S] ago 

When I say climate change I more so mean man made climate change, which he very much denies.

Your only real reason to be skeptical is because the scientist might be biased? That's just insane.

It's not "too sacred" to question, it has simply just been answered already. 97% of scientist agree that man made activity is causing climate change. If you don't believe them, then I simply can't convince you.