1
34

[–] 7639824? 1 point 34 points (+35|-1) ago 

“It’s obsolete, first because it was designed many, many years ago,” Trump was quoted as saying about the trans-Atlantic military alliance. “Secondly, countries aren’t paying what they should” and NATO “didn’t deal with terrorism.”

Trump understands:

  • NATO needs the US.
  • The US does not need NATO.

Observations and Predictions:

  • If Europe wants to reside under the protection we provide, yet criticize every foreign policy decision we make, let them pay to garrison their own defense.

  • Europe has allowed the Moors to overrun their continent, and will cry for our help 15 years from now. Then, they will complain about how we help and demand our soldiers be tried for war crimes. Why bother?

  • Furthermore, we don't need protection against the Russians. We are the only army that coud engage them successfully in battle. We can form our own peace with Russia, because we are strong. We do not need NATO to do this.

Fuck NATO.

3
8

[–] SaneGoatiSwear 3 points 8 points (+11|-3) ago 

spot on.

0
2

[–] Pwning4Ever 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

The United States could fucking occupy the EU easily, and those loser cucks won't put up a fight.

0
3

[–] ComedicGoat 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

I dunno, they'd probably break a few lump-wristed numale arms at you and wave angry rainbow signs but ultimately they'd be cucked like bitches.

3
29

[–] Troll 3 points 29 points (+32|-3) ago 

If NATO wants to stay relevant it needs to fulfill its original purpose, and that's defense.

So instead of piling up with Russia's border NATO troops should be killing and deporting the Muslim invaders from Europe.

1
6

[–] novictim 1 point 6 points (+7|-1) ago 

I'm glad I am not the only one to figure this out!

0
0

[–] Ciscogeek ago 

Realize that statement means: "I want NATO occupying my city." :|

20
-18

0
8

[–] voteforfreedom 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

NATO IS PLAYED OUT...

rubbish masked as defense

0
6

[–] novictim 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

If NATO remains obsessed after the Cold War with "Soviet"Russian imperial ambitions then, yes, it is obsolete. If it turns its attention to defending the Free World from Islam and secondarily, Chinese aggression, then it will find a legitimate reason to exist.

I am not saying that NATO should not have a ready defense against a Russian aggression. But NATO has a more pressing concern with a 3million strong Islamic invasion force occupying Europe under its very nose.

0
2

[–] Pwning4Ever 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

NATO hasn't done fuck with China who is aggressively expanding its territorial claims.

0
4

[–] Wargasm 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

This is an over simplistic understanding of foreign relations.

The United States of America has the strongest armed forces that have ever existed--that is for a reason.

That reason is not because we have more enemies than any country that has ever been, but because the US treats its armed forces like an export; something that can be leveraged in negotiations.

By threatening to withdraw support, President Trump gives the other nations incentive to build up their armed forces and reduce their long-term dependence on the US for military aid.

In the short term, America will save a few dollars. In the long term, America will lose its leverage.

0
2

[–] Dalai_Llama 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

So you are arguing for an increased military industrial complex, all around the world?

1
1

[–] Pwning4Ever 1 point 1 point (+2|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Who the fuck cares about Europe, we have Russia on our side.

At the end of the day, Europeans will be our little bitch.

1
-1

[–] lostnewbie 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

there might be something to the notion that we have more enemies than anyone else

6
-6

0
4

[–] GLADIAT0R 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Take us home, daddy

[–] [deleted] 1 point 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

[Deleted]

0
0

[–] GLADIAT0R ago 

It is time, my child

1
2

[–] MadMonkey 1 point 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

So it seems everyone here considers NATO outdated as well, my reserve is that General Mattis stated

The retired Marine Corps general, according to a Politico report, labeled NATO so central to the U.S.’s defensive posture that, if it did not today exist it would need to be built.

I'm inclined to believe Mattis is more aware of geopolitics and more knowledgeable on military capabilities as well.

0
1

[–] Inque_Yutani 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

That doesn't mean it's current state isn't obsolete.

0
0

[–] Gettm ago 

He could be saying this just to get confirmed for his position.

0
2

[–] derram 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

https://archive.is/SO2Oh | https://vgy.me/1mJguS.png :

Trump Calls NATO Obsolete and Dismisses EU in German Interview - Bloomberg

'For that reason, Trump said, he’s fairly indifferent whether the EU breaks up or stays together, according to Bild. '

'Your guide to the most important business stories of the day, every day. '

'You will now receive the Technology newsletter What to eat, drink, wear and drive – in real life and your dreams. '

'Quoted in German from a conversation held in English, Trump predicted Britain’s exit from the EU will be a success and portrayed the EU as an instrument of German domination with the purpose of beating the U.S. in international trade. '

'You will now receive the Pursuits newsletter The school, work and life hacks you need to get ahead. '

This has been an automated message.

2
0

[–] SaneGoatiSwear 2 points 0 points (+2|-2) ago 

fyi that img pop down thingy is cool, but for whatever reason in dark mode, that text is unreadable.

0
1

[–] derram 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

It's because some sites rely on your browser to fill in the background color instead of setting one themselves.

Prolly just switch over to jpg since there's no transparency there.

load more comments ▼ (5 remaining)