[–] THENEWCONTRARIAN 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
Yes he did, not only for his offense but also for his defense against Lebron.
[–] THENEWCONTRARIAN 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
His defense on Lebron was tough, even though Lebron got his you could easily tell Andre made it far more difficult. And Andre's offense spoke for itself.
[–] beachedlife 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
Not at all, shoulda went to Joe Lacob
He finally realized Mark Jackson was terrible at actually coaching and fired him, letting a coach that actually understands X's and O's come in.
[–] THENEWCONTRARIAN 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
By that logic I think it should go to Steve Kerr because he made Joe look smart.
[–] ILoveMakonnen ago
Eh. I don't subscribe to the belief that he was the most valuable player on the Warriors. I asked myself "Would the Warriors still win if Andre sat out one or two games?" and I believe they still would have. Now, if you asked me if they would have won had Steph Curry sat out, I would give you a resounding "no".
On the other side, some people are advocating/ were advocating for Lebron to win for the numbers he put up. Unfortunately, the Cavs didn't win, so I don't think it should be rewarded to the losing team and its best player.
I'm willing to discuss my stance.