1
31

[–] detcadder 1 point 31 points (+32|-1) ago 

When Obama legalized propaganda, it didn't mean that the the media wouldn't demand money to publish it.

0
6

[–] 7565585? 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

How did Obama legalize propaganda?

0
21

[–] unpaid_orgy_intern 0 points 21 points (+21|-0) ago 

NDAA in 2013, if I recall correctly.

0
16

[–] redditrunbyfascists 0 points 16 points (+16|-0) ago 

http://foreignpolicy.com/2013/07/14/u-s-repeals-propaganda-ban-spreads-government-made-news-to-americans/

He repealed a ban on using propaganda within the USA.

there is a thing called Voice of America (VOA) broadcast in hostile countries and all over the world in 61 languages.

This lets sandniggers listen to VOA and al-shebab instead of just al-shebab.

The thinking behind legalizing the broadcast of VOA within the USA was that the diaspora groups can listen to stations like al-shebab and RT, but can't listen to VOA.

However that also opened the door for the USG to lie to americans constantly, and if you think they aren't... then you are stupider than the excuse they used to repeal the ban on propaganda.

0
5

[–] redditrunbyfascists 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago  (edited ago)

pretty sure it was in 2012(I looked it up, it looks like july 2013 --- checked again in more depth it looks like 2012. I was right the first time). back then, the USG could only make and show propaganda in countries outside the USA.

After that rule change, the USG was able to produce propaganda in the USA.

I consider the rule change the start of allowing massive false flags to become a much more common occurrence.

I'm not usually a huge fan of massive conspiracies, but there are some big problems with the sandy hook footage and the boston bombing both have big problems and some of the people look like actors.

I'm not saying they didn't happen, but it sure does look like some of the people involved are actors, and those actors then got used on national television to push narratives.

sandy hook: gun control NOW!

boston: islam is bad, and the new normal will be cops going through peoples houses when they feel like it.

I'm not saying no one died at either incident, but that they seem likely to have had government influence to create media responses that exaggerated events to push talking points on TV.

I think that kind of thing is despicable.

In the world where sandy hook and the boston bombing actually happened it's despicable because they are riding on others misfortune to push policy.

In the world where neither event actually occurred, then it's straight up mind control of the population.

I also find it suspicious that there is literally zero footage of the pulse shooting, or the more recent airport shooting in florida...

both of these locations should have hours upon hours of footage available. both perps are neutralized, so why can't we see the footage now???

Somethings does not add up.

I then get a little bit annoyed when we now just talk about these questionable events like they are facts, when they actually appear to be highly manufactured.

0
0

[–] detcadder ago 

At the end of 2012 he signed HR4310 which nullified the Smith-Mundt Act of 1948 which explicitly forbade the government from running information and psychological operations aimed at influencing U.S. public opinion. Now the government can go beyond manipulating news to directly dissimulate misinformation campaigns. Sorry I didn't get back to you earlier. I didn't notice the mail icon. :/

0
15

[–] vastrightwing 0 points 15 points (+15|-0) ago 

The comments are more interesting in that they think Trump will fix things. Trump can't fix people's laziness. You have to fact check yourself. Relying on others to think for you is exactly how we got here!

0
3

[–] Grifter42 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

He'll fire the people who don't do their jobs.

0
13

[–] heroinwinsagain 0 points 13 points (+13|-0) ago  (edited ago)

do us all a favor and stop posting videos from facebook. id rather not fucking see it than go to fucking facebook.

0
10

[–] Terrorist 0 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago 

This is super old.

Here's a wiki with more info on it.

I'm not saying this isn't important, but your headline is really misleading.

  1. She doesn't work for CNN

  2. This happened in 2012

  3. The video you see was taken from an interview on infowars.

0
4

[–] 93503847569 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

so... why is this post so highly rated still? Are people only reading the titles now? I thought that was a problem reserved for reddit

0
2

[–] Terrorist 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

No it's still quite the issue here.

People don't read the articles and there aren't any mods to tag/remove them accordingly.

0
1

[–] tonberry2 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

The source may be old, but the issue is very current. It was just last month that various political entities launched a crusade against "fake news" sources that were reporting stories that did not paint "the party" in a particularly favorable light (i.e. they were telling the truth), but this censorship does not include sources such as CNN that actually are producing "real" fake news. I believe OP is just reminding everyone that long ago it was already established that CNN produces fake news. It's up to you to figure out that nobody is calling for their censorship.

0
10

[–] Troll 0 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago 

Never trust anything until it's officially denied.

0
9

[–] lurkulongtime 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

More like these thieving bastards are making the tax payers pay for the privilege of being lied to.

0
6

[–] canbot 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

Fuck facebook. Anyone have a mirror?

0
1

[–] cyks 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

I'm only providing a link because you asked. It's a one minute video about an Arabian monarchy paying CNN to broadcast propaganda. In my opinion, this is just a fraction of the outrageous bullshit that CNN is guilty of. This is like showing michelle obama's adams apple when she has a full grown pecker up hillary's nostril.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BO-TyETzNO8

0
1

[–] placoid 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

She has a site about psychedelics, reset.me.

load more comments ▼ (8 remaining)