[–] Frenchgeek 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago
No. But it is interesting to see it was your first explanation for it...
Because the submission is probably treated as two differents submissions and the comment counting mechanics distribute the load for performances reason, I'd say.
[–] Frenchgeek 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago
So because you don't know how the web work nobody else does too?
Well, have fun with your superiority complex and your paranoïa...
[–] Memorexem 2 points -1 points 1 point (+1|-2) ago
No. It's two separate posts, as a glitch from anon-ing and/or sticking it.
Just stop with the witch hunts. You know they're not, or the counts would look the same because if you're shadow banned guess what. You're still shadow banned, and you wouldn't count on either of them.
I feel this won't get through to you, anyway, so... Yep.
[–] Frenchgeek 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
Ah, so you didn't understand my explanation...
You know, instead of going for the throat because of it, you could simply have said so, I would have reluctantly dumbed it down for you.
[–] [deleted] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
[–] arrggg [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Awesome news, and thanks for the link to the developer's explanation.