2
-1

[–] Memorexem 2 points -1 points (+1|-2) ago 

No. It's two separate posts, as a glitch from anon-ing and/or sticking it.

Just stop with the witch hunts. You know they're not, or the counts would look the same because if you're shadow banned guess what. You're still shadow banned, and you wouldn't count on either of them.

I feel this won't get through to you, anyway, so... Yep.

2
0

[–] arrggg [S] 2 points 0 points (+2|-2) ago 

That makes more sense that that frenchgeek bullshit.

I will ask any damn thing I please. Stop whining about witch hunts like a pathetic tool, you sound like those anti-free speech nazis.

1
-1

[–] Frenchgeek 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

Ah, so you didn't understand my explanation...

You know, instead of going for the throat because of it, you could simply have said so, I would have reluctantly dumbed it down for you.

1
0

[–] Frenchgeek 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

No. But it is interesting to see it was your first explanation for it...

Because the submission is probably treated as two differents submissions and the comment counting mechanics distribute the load for performances reason, I'd say.

1
0

[–] arrggg [S] 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

probably

Nice wild guess. You must be in sales to quickly polish bullshit that fast.

1
0

[–] Frenchgeek 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

So because you don't know how the web work nobody else does too?

Well, have fun with your superiority complex and your paranoïa...

0
0

[–] arrggg [S] ago 

This is what the front page\new looked like when not logged in this morning. Notice the vote and comment count sare different. Reminds me of eddit when there are shadowbanned comments.

Has shadowbanning been implemented?

[–] [deleted] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
1

[–] arrggg [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Awesome news, and thanks for the link to the developer's explanation.