[–] 7531754? 2 points 15 points 17 points (+17|-2) ago
Lol he wasnt promoting equality (i think, i am not a historian). Germany was very very poor at the time, over 6 milion unemplyed, high homlessness, basicly a terrible country. In his first year he emplyed over 3 milion people, kicked out banks that were putting germans in lifetime debts. Cant remember more, but aside from jew "killings", he was a perfect president.
[–] Thetiedyeguy 4 points 4 points 8 points (+8|-4) ago
If he was all about killing Jews, why did he make the camps, almost like the nazis wanted to exterminate jews by preventing breeding and not by murder. I guess it's a mystery of history that you can't ponder without becoming a massive evil hitler guy.
[–] JanMichaelVincent 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
(((banks)))
[–] White_Phillip 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago (edited ago)
I think Hitler was a cool guy, Eh kills enemies of the german people and doesnt afraid of anything
[–] 8_billion_eaters 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
"Hitler was a tuned in dude who leveled the karma of the jews." - C. Manson.
[–] Islamiscancer 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
While i gwr and appreciate the joke, you are really portrayin Hitler and his motivations incorrectly.
But ill still give you an UpBoat because you can make Reddit faggots angry with this
[–] TAThatBoomerang ago
Was Hitler really promoting equality? What the hell even is equality, anyway? As far as I'm aware, he was looking out for his own people.
[–] Rainy-Day-Dream 0 points 21 points 21 points (+21|-0) ago
the school snubbed him, he designed what would go on to become one of the most recognized flags in human history. Also it's not that he thought they were privileged it's more so that he thought they were parasites damaging his home country
[–] Frowning_Buffalo 0 points 17 points 17 points (+17|-0) ago
He wasn't wrong. In fact, Hitler was Reich.
[–] Thetiedyeguy 1 point 6 points 7 points (+7|-1) ago
He was a pretty good painter and sketch artist really, he made his living in Vienna by selling portraits and landscape pieces and such, his works are quite still though, very exact, but kind of lifeless. Bloody impressive that he was self taught, with training I'm sure he would have been quite the painter. This one is my fave http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2015/6/21/1434885572206/32dd2ac1-ed8e-46b4-8414-e754840287bb-2060x1236.jpeg
[–] fricknmaniac 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
He was a pretty good painter, but the main problem is that he wasn't good enough to be one of the best painters. And since he applied to the Academy of Fine Arts Vienna which was considered one of the best, if not the best art schools at the time, it was doomed to failure. It'd be like if you tried to apply to Harvard with a 3.9 GPA. Sure you're one of the best, but Harvard is going to deny a ton of applications that are even better than yours, so you have no hope of getting in.
[–] Pwning4Ever 3 points -2 points 1 point (+1|-3) ago
Does the man in the high castle live there?