Consider the influence the U.S. corporate media had in the elections. Yet they still lost. U.S. corporate media was much more blatant by covering up Mrs. Clinton's malfeasance. RT may have pointed out Mrs. Clintons malfeasance, so yes, they in effect did the job U.S. media should have done. It's OK for media to influence elections as long as the reporting is truthful. The motivation is less important.
[–] vastrightwing ago
Consider the influence the U.S. corporate media had in the elections. Yet they still lost. U.S. corporate media was much more blatant by covering up Mrs. Clinton's malfeasance. RT may have pointed out Mrs. Clintons malfeasance, so yes, they in effect did the job U.S. media should have done. It's OK for media to influence elections as long as the reporting is truthful. The motivation is less important.