[–] 7518977? 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
It's not really new, there are precedents, in a not so distant past
Pedophiles groups attempted to infiltrate the ranks of the left during the 70s / 80s, they promoted their agenda under the banner of alternative /exotic sexualities, blending with gays.
Looking back from 2014, it seems extraordinary that an organisation with a name like the Paedophile Information Exchange was taken so seriously for a time in the 1970s that it was able to present itself as a legitimate pressure group. Yet the continuing row involving Harriet Harman, Patricia Hewitt, Jack Dromey and the Daily Mail reminds us that this was indeed the case.
While superficially it may seem that there were a lot of gullible people in the 1970s prepared to consider PIE’s arguments, the reality is more complex. The boundaries of what was acceptable in terms of sexual behaviour were changing rapidly. Homosexuality had been decriminalised in 1967 but there was still considerable discrimination against gay people. Gays were beginning to hold demonstrations; even the word “gay” was just starting to be accepted.
The wider political movement of the libertarian left encompassed a whole range of other issues, from abortion rights and domestic violence to getting troops out of Northern Ireland and supporting liberation movements in third world countries. Naturally a lot of confusion ensued about what was acceptable and where the boundaries should lie.
Into this maelstrom plunged PIE, which was formed in 1974 by a group of paedophiles who defined themselves as child lovers – as the word literally means in Greek – rather than necessarily being interested in sex with children. The strategy was masterminded by Tom O’Carroll, the organisation’s public face. (This did eventually cost him his job as press officer for the Open University.)
PIE’s aim was “to alleviate suffering of many adults and children” by campaigning against the laws on the age of consent, to allow adults to have sex with children. Knowing that the idea of middle-aged men buggering young children was an unpalatable image to promote, members transformed their message into a language of liberation in tune with the zeitgeist. Since the Gay Liberation Front represented homosexuals and the feminist movement supported women, paedophile activists could be for children’s rights. People interested in children were to be considered as “kind persons”. just as homosexuals had managed to appropriate the word “gay”. It seems a preposterous plan; but for a while it came close to working.
...
I believe the recent push behind the gay rights agenda (regarding adoption and surrogate mothers ), is also "stealthy" supported by both pedo groups and big pharma, under the pretence of tolerance equality and shit
[–] greycloud 2 points -1 points 1 point (+1|-2) ago
1:46 "Now I'm not opposed to off color humor, and I most certainly do not offend easily. But none of what I just watched was in any way funny. It just seriously creeped me out."
she offends easily and doesn't like off color humor. she can't take a joke, she is like a feminist getting all offended. she says one thing, than immediately proves that she is a liar.
[–] 7517219? 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago
We are going to push the left into ovens.
[–] smokratez 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Oy Vey.
[–] ScientiaPotentia ago
Berlin was degenerate too in the years leading up to National Socialism.
[–] 7521923? ago
This is why they say Trump is "LITERALLY HITLER". The jew had full power and a white man stepped in to save the day.
[–] great_regret ago
All of them. It needs to be said. Not just the "fringe" they invented to escape blame for all the nasty shit they do, but every single one last one of them. They all deserve to die.
It's not only SJWs, it's not only the "regressive" left, it's not only the ctrl-left and whatever other cutesy names they come up with to label the idiots among them that say out loud what they're all thinking, they're all vermin, they all deserve the gas chamber.