[–] norobotono ago
The only thing that is shaky is your insistence on seeing only what you want to see regardless of what the evidence proves. The peers of the doctor did not agree with her findings when it went up for review. The anal injuries were not anything like the doctor had made them out to be in both her first and second examination and were most likely caused by constipation or the enema which the mother had given them for it. The constipation likely having been caused by Abraham's forcing a change of diet onto the children.
Or perhaps it was caused due to neglecting to ensure the children ate or drank enough, because the school were concerned about their well-being after finding them eating food from a bin at school because they were so hungry. Or how about the time the social services were called by a neighbor because the mother locked them out on the balcony in their nightwear for hours with no food or drink.
So are you saying that the cuts and bruises on the children were caused by the father 3 months ago and that neither the mother nor Abraham saw them in all that time?
[–] pizzaboss [S] ago (edited ago)
No i suspect the cuts and bruises occured after they were taken into custody with the police. Please continue your campaign in this new post https://voat.co/v/pizzagatewhatever/1541891
[–] norobotono ago
Despite the fact they are clearly visible on the video BEFORE they went to the police. You are truly delusional.