You can't even follow your own arguments.
No, you just lack reading comprehension. I mentioned explicitly several times that I wasn't talking about morality.
By your argument, even v/babyrape isn't off the table in the name of freedom of speech.
This is correct. Now you're getting it. If there are people in that community actively participating in illegal activities, legal action should be taken against those users, not the web service that hosts their community. The issue isn't moral, it's legal. Regardless of whether or not you approve of an idea or group of people should have no bearing on whether or not that idea or group of people have a right to exist. Simply put, if you don't like it, you have every right and ability to ignore it.
If you're so concerned about /v/jailbait, why don't you just go dox them and give their info to the F.B.I. or something?
It's not Atko's responsibility to play thought police.
[–] 1smartass ago (edited ago)
Knowing that jailbait exists on his website at the very least makes him responsible for what might happen on it, or what others will think about it, including potential clients of his. No big company is going to want to be associated with a site that has a name that implies it's about statutory rape.
I'm done with you, I feel like I'm debating someone who's feeble minded.
[–] FFX01 ago
You're just frustrated because you're wrong. Also, resorting to insulting me isn't going to make you seem anymore intelligent. In fact, it's counter-productive.