0
0

[–] 1smartass ago  (edited ago)

jailĀ·bait

A female young enough that doing something sexual with her would land you in jail.

By definition, it doesn't mean 18, it could mean 9 years old, and you're arguing that it should exist as a site on Voat or Reddit, so speaking of absurd arguments.

0
0

[–] FFX01 ago 

Why are you applying morality to the issue? This isn't about morality. A lot of people seem to think this is a moral issue. It's not. Stop treating it like one. Regardless if I think it's wrong or not, as long as it isn't hurting one, I see no problems.

0
0

[–] 1smartass ago 

I'm amazed this is coming from someone who invoked reductio ad absurdium as a counter argument. You're literally arguing that sex doesn't involve morals, even sex with someone of an age that would be illegal.

You're literally saying sex with a 9 year old wouldn't involve morals.

Even with your silly argument that it's just a silly name for a harmless subsite, well all it takes is one creep, one activist trying to make a point, and no moderators around, and you have a business killing incident on your hands.

Ask for that kind of trouble when you're at the helm of a website or website host.