0
0

[–] guinness2 [S] ago 

Obviously religious figures are not scientists.

But they say they are.

I've worked with Christians research scientists.

So here's the crux: why do you think a "scientist" who is funded by the EU globalists is any more trustworthy that a "scientist" who is funded by the Templeton Foundation?

Where is the funding for the climate change deniers coming from, for that matter? The answer to that question is well known. They are funded by oil companies and other profiteers who couldn't care less about ecology.

Do you understand how irrational it is to distrust climate skeptics who are funded by oil companies and then trust global warming claims made by people funded by globalists?

0
0

[–] TheStapler ago 

The globalists use climate science disingenuously as it fits well with their goal of making white people feel guilty. That doesn't make it false.

I think it's just common sense. When you drag up millions of barrels of oil out of the earth and burn it, every day for a century, what do you think happens to all the waste product? It has to have some negative effect on the environment, and the effect of warming the planet a little bit seems pretty plausible, doesn't it?

0
0

[–] guinness2 [S] ago 

The globalists use climate science disingenuously as it fits well with their goal of making white people feel guilty. That doesn't make it false.

Because people who find terrorism and orchestrate the economic destruction of countries wouldn't tell a lie?

Sorry, would you like to try again at making a compelling rebuttal?