[–] Hawtmess69 [S] ago
Submission /v/pizzagate/1532665 deleted Your submission /v/pizzagate/1532665 has been deleted by: @Millennial_Falcon on 1/2/2017 8:15:25 PM Reason given: rule 2 Original Submission
New Assange/Hannity @ embassy interview scheduled.
https://m.reddit.com/r/WikiLeaks/comments/5ln52m/sean_hannity_will_interview_julian_assange_inside/
[–] gopluckyourself 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Since this is a discussion post I'll alllow you to edit it but as it sits it is in violation of rule 1: ALL submissions should be directly related to Pizzagate. It is the responsibility of the poster to demonstrate this relevance. In most cases this will require a Discussion post where you provide a brief explanation of how your content relates to the investigation. Sometimes there will be content (like an article on Pizzagate) where a link post with an accurate, descriptive title will be enough to satisfy this requirement.
[–] Hawtmess69 [S] ago
Um pizza investigators are very interested in seeing proof of life ? Or are they not ?
[–] gopluckyourself 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
I very much so am but you have to demonstrate relevance to the pizzagate investigation otherwise this post is in violation of rule 1 and is more appropriate for /v/whereisassange.
[–] Millennial_Falcon [M] ago (edited ago)
May be because I'm not on mobile, but when I click your link, it goes to a giant photo of assange and a photo of hannity. Deleting again, per rule 2. By the way, reposting something that has been deleted, rather than discussing with the mod, is a good way to get banned.
[–] Hawtmess69 [S] ago
I was okd to repost as a discussion per Jwv dude so naybe you. should all be on the same rules. . I have No reason to be banned
[–] Millennial_Falcon ago
This isn't an issue of ambiguity of the rules. The issue is whether your source shows there is a meeting. Please link to original source.
[–] Hawtmess69 [S] ago
Oops Kevdude. Yes there also is a Article below the pic. Perhaps scrolling down to read will hellp