[–] Lemongarb 0 points 9 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago
I had a feeling @IconoclastHighKing was promoting this site or SCP farming.
[–] IconoclastHighKing 13 points -2 points 11 points (+11|-13) ago
To me, it's the same like someone posting a link to a youtube video published by him and getting ad revenue in return, though if you use Adblocker, your view doesn't count on Supload. I didn't think that was spamming as I'm contributing content for a shitty bitcoin repay. But if it is looked down upon here, I can avoid that altogether.
[–] ForgotMyName 0 points 6 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago
I noticed it a while ago; I've been torn on the subject. The original claimed plan for voat was that you'd get paid for your contributions (in some fashion). It seems that supload does exactly that. So it seems somewhat hypocritical to say I'm against it when I supported the original concept behind voat. However, I do hate spam and I do see it as a slippery slope. If we could get a handle on bot upvotes/downvotes then I'd say that it's okay. Users will continue to determine what content moves up and people will get paid accordingly and I'm okay with that.
[–] individualin1984 1 point 1 point 2 points (+2|-1) ago
Did you just use the word "problematic"...
[–] stretched_girl 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
I get no image on hovering their links. I don't like them.
[–] [deleted] 3 points 4 points 7 points (+7|-3) ago
[–] ashekchum 2 points -2 points 0 points (+0|-2) ago
Right