1
-1

[–] Nana66 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

Truthfully I feel if there was something we could find out over the Internet it's been scrubbed...they don't mess around. Our only hope is screw ups and they don't matter in the big picture.

0
1

[–] draegspir 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Every time I come here there are consistently ~1k users browsing. I don't think participation has gone down at all. Lack of upvotes could be due to lack of new information. Lower number of content submission could be due to rules resulting in better-groomed posts. Voat recently locked-down signups, so maybe that also contributes to lack of growth.

I haven't been paying attention to all the drama if it exists, but can you or someone point me in a direction that shows mods are compromised here? Like what critical posts were deleted, or who they banned/silenced?

I've mentioned this in a few other places, but I'm currently working on an iOS Voat app over at /v/voatify, so if it gets successfully published, maybe that can drive up participation and exposure.

7
-7

4
-3

[–] rootthemout 4 points -3 points (+1|-4) ago 

All my posts have been removed. So I am not trying to share info. anymore

[–] [deleted] 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago  (edited ago)

[Deleted]

7
-7

2
-2

[–] Air_Gate 2 points -2 points (+0|-2) ago 

We did it Shilldit!

1
0

[–] shakethetree 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

I am not sure this sub is the legit place to stay any longer. Today my post was flagged as "Possible Disinformation" without any notice or discussion. I have yet to hear back from one single Mod on the grounds for the mislabel. It is titled as follows: "Pizzagate Represents Only a Single American Franchise Within a Worldwide Child Trafficking Operation Known As Pedogate" and is found at https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1522318. My post of last week titled as follows: [Testimonial] I Was a Sex Slave to Europe's Elite at Age 6, was deleted under questionable violation of the rules. Found here: https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1502398. Turns out the user named Gopluckyourself who aggressively petitioned to get my post on the testimonial deleted is now a Moderator!

7
-2

[–] Millennial_Falcon 7 points -2 points (+5|-7) ago 

I didn't put that flair on your post (https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1522318)), but I have removed it for you (see my comment in thread).

1
0

[–] 7405486? 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Many (myself included) were expecting that when this leaked we'd see something more substantial that emails and code words. We expected that within a few days or weeks we'd have victims coming forward (we're going into months at this point).

Until we see people coming forward with (or leaking) video evidence that implicates individuals it'll become more and more difficult to actively support pizzagate.

I'm not contributing to the downvoating, but forgive me if I stop being interested until more substantial evidence is presented.

0
0

[–] SpikyAube ago 

Where would victims go, how would they come forward? I believe there have been a few people who have made posts saying they were victims. But it's not like if they call the New York Times or CNN they'll be listened to, and they are probably not very trusting of the police given how LE has been implicated from the bottom up. Plus it seems Wikileaks has been compromised, or even if it hasn't, the rumours that it has been are everywhere, so if I was a victim I wouldn't want to go there.

I think we should somehow set up a way for victims to speak out and submit evidence if they have any, kind of like a wikileaks thing. No idea how to do it safely and effectively, but it could be like a proper citizens organisation - no links to any government agencies or departments, no links with or sponsorship from big business, no involvement with any corporate/mainstream media - just 100% nice normal people wanting to help each other out. The main problem is ensuring only nice normal people get involved with it. I actually think this is one of the most important things that should have been set up ages ago.

0
0

[–] 7406551? ago  (edited ago)

Creating a group like you're describing could too easily be corrupted. Those involved have connections, but they can't be everywhere.

Most people in law enforcement try to do the right thing and could be trusted as long as you kept working with the same people (avoid getting handed off). Going on liveleaks with a statement of being raped and naming names would also be a decent action.

I'm genuinely surprised none of the honest and moderate papers tried to be safe havens. Without someone in the media to give you a positive voice and make connections (or at least give this an honest listen) the PizzaGate group will fail.

9
-2

[–] Millennial_Falcon [M] 9 points -2 points (+7|-9) ago  (edited ago)

Deleting per rule 2 and 4. No sources, and meta concern posts don't go here. By the way, the real shill problem we are having is people posting shitposts, not the mods. The mods are protecting the quality of the sub. Shills attack the mods to create distrust and disruption. Their methods are disrupt, deny, and discourage.

3
-3

[–] bikergang_accountant 3 points -3 points (+0|-3) ago 

Meta very much should be able to be discussed in a thread.

8
-2

[–] Millennial_Falcon 8 points -2 points (+6|-8) ago 

Allowing these concern posts would be a slippery slope. For one thing, it would give shills an opening to spam concern posts to try to disrupt the sub.

Not to mention: OP didn't even make a argument to support his complaint about the rules. The truth is that the rules haven't change significantly. The only significant change is that sources are required for claims of fact. Also, the impetus for rule change, and asking the community to weigh in on rules, came from kevdude (of protectvoat) himself. The point is to have a small number of clear rules that can be consistently/fairly enforced.

load more comments ▼ (3 remaining)