0
14

[–] antiracistNew 0 points 14 points (+14|-0) ago 

Russia isn't that stupid. They'd just respond by saying there are only two genders, and then laugh at stewing Democrats until Trump takes office.

0
5

[–] individualin1984 [S] 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Are they going to laugh off that asshole ordering a shoot down of Russian bombers over Allepo, or a coordinated cyber attack on Russian infrastructure?

1
5

[–] antiracistNew 1 point 5 points (+6|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Democrats can't hack. Only white men, azns, and non-Muslim Middle Easterners can. And they shouldn't be so stupid to obey military orders to launch nukes. They should laugh and respond that they're waiting for Trump.

0
0

[–] inescutcheon_proper ago  (edited ago)

Speaking only to your first point:

There are three genders.

In Russian, they are: ΟΗ, ΟΗΑ, and ΟΗΟ.

In English, they are: HE, SHE, and IT.

I.E.: Masculine, Feminine, and Neuter.

This used to be common knowledge, before the Gender Wars.

Interestingly, pairs used to have their own gender (i.e. "Duo"), but it died out before Classical Greek. So "salt and pepper", "man and wife", "table and chair", etc., would have constituted a fourth gender in archaic times.

0
8

[–] guinness2 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

Yep, the truth about Hillary Clinton and the DNC's crimes, including rigging the nomination, cheating at every presidential debate, orchestrating widespread election fraud, corrupting the State and Justice departments for personal enrichment and committing domestic terrorist attacks on peaceful citizens at Trump rallies... did sway the voting public.

The truth is the Democrats would be willing to start a needless war to cover their crimes: they'd likely burn America to the ground if it kept 'em from being arrested for their crimes.

It is disturbing to watch the Democrats attempt to steal our Constitutional right to hold free elections and implement America's first female president dictator, however I take comfort in knowing what profound failures they are and how they can't even make a ham sandwich without fucking that up too (thanks Michelle Obama).

0
3

[–] uvulectomy 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

"...they'd likely burn America to the ground if it kept 'em from being arrested for their crimes."

Shit, they're trying to do that now in a desperate last-ditch effort to be able to say they "won." But yeah, they know that a SHITLOAD of them are going to go to jail for a very, VERY long time if any of their crimes ever make it past a federal grand jury. The corrupt chickens are coming home to roost, and the left is terrified.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

[Deleted]

0
5

[–] Troll 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

It's not about losing the election. It's about what comes next. And that's jail time. The Dems are gonna fucking hang.

0
1

[–] 7275292? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Or...

It's about declaring a state of emergency to stay in power. I wouldn't put it past Mr. Obama. He's the last guy I want to lead us into a war.

0
0

[–] 7275135? ago  (edited ago)

They might talk some smack, but the fact is the Democrats don't actually have any control. Best they can do is concern troll in the media.

0
4

[–] epsilona01 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

They're looking for an excuse to declare martial law. They know they won't flip the electors, so it's the only chance they have to retain power.

0
1

[–] gocubsgo4417 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

I wonder how much of this could have been calculated with the establishment. There was a pretty big push during the election to talk about pushing back against Russia anyway. Maybe the plan was to have a Clinton administration provoke Russia into open warfare. It does seem like the populace is tiring on the War on Terror, and now they are just looking for their next war?

0
0

[–] individualin1984 [S] ago 

You would think that that they could muster up enough sense to not go to war with the one country that has more and better nukes than we do....

0
1

[–] gocubsgo4417 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

I don't know if they have more and better nukes than we do, but they certainly aren't the Afghans. I think what this shows is that we've officially moved to a state of Total War. The US economy and the people who truly hold the power can't afford (both in terms of political capital and monetary streams) to have the US stop it's expansion toward empire.

0
1

[–] serjsbeard 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

I am astonished. Obama knows this isn't real. Hopefully this doesn't actually push us into war. They'll probably blame it on Trump 20 years from now if it does spark war.

0
1

[–] dontforgetaboutevil 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

1.2 billion wasn't spent just on the election then. Maybe from the beginning some of Hillary's investors wanted war.

load more comments ▼ (1 remaining)