0
2

[–] ryguyhermosa 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

full interview - sounds legit https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b6qlc3lStM4

0
0

[–] 0101buckyballs0101 ago 

Why did he respond only after they were going to drop the files today. Last week when everybody was on twitter trying to get POL he did not surface.

When 90% of you "fanbase" is asking for you and it has no effect on the WL data or research into it, why not give POL when requested.

He asked for that twitter army, to have them fret over POL for weeks seems counter-productive.

0
0

[–] elgindelta ago 

https://youtu.be/ohmajJTcpNk. ➕

https://www.google.com/amp/www.zdnet.com/google-amp/article/google-deepmind-wins-again-ai-trounces-human-expert-in-lip-reading-face-off/

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.engadget.com/amp/2016/09/10/google-deepmind-ai-wavenet-text-to-speech/ Equals, ♠

The idea that the most camera friendly member of wikileaks, founder Julian Assange has been, and still is staying "Out Of View" is wishful thinking.

Julian Is Dead, The Notion Of Him Being Anywhere Is A Litteral "Fake News" Headline. Issued By The Most "Deplorable" Evil People In The World. To Keep You Distracted With Hope, Frozen In Anticipation. WakeUp

0
1

[–] shillcrusher13 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

"While the voice was easy to be spoofed..." ?? WTF. The language, the font, the tone of the writing here all seem way off... The previous message on the site had a glaring spelling error, and the offer and the timing seemed a little too good to be true. As much as I wanted there to be something to this, it seems like this whole thing was a false lead unfortunately. I hope they didn't kill him. What a mess.

0
0

[–] norobotono [S] ago 

It is strange wording unless English is not the writer's first or native language.

0
0

[–] Wake2bake ago 

This is so obviously bullshit it's suspicious to why they've done it? To take our attention away from other developments perhaps.

0
0

[–] norobotono [S] ago 

They could have dragged it out for a few weeks in that case rather than the short period this site has been known about.

0
0

[–] Yates ago 

ful interview with commercials https://a.uguu.se/Ro1lG1O3mWQE_JulianAssangeInterviewonHannityShowWICO-AMwithcommercials2016-12-15.webm

the uploader said this link will expire in 24 hours

0
0

[–] norobotono [S] ago 

The interview would only be about 2-3 minutes long if they edited all the commercials out of it. :)

0
0

[–] srayzie ago 

No. i listened on YouTube for like 25 minutes with no commercials

0
1

[–] dafacts 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

The voice sounds legit, having compared to other recordings. Also I'm an Aussie so easy for me to spot differences in that accent. But I agree, until actual proof of life is provided we can basically ignore the whole site. Hopefully it is all legit and hopefully Wikileaks actually delivers at the most critical time.

0
0

[–] EyesWideScared ago 

Hannity is a terrible interviewer. Did he even ask Julian how he's been doing?

load more comments ▼ (11 remaining)