0
1

[–] lastresort09 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

We need to figure out a new way of deciding who mods the popular subs with common names like politics, news, science, etc. These subs shouldn't be considered the same as others, and shouldn't be simply - first come first dibs. Perhaps there needs be a rubric against which such mods are tested.

0
1

[–] immibis 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

0
0

[–] ooli ago 

No! It should put a ccp limit to keep modding: you're inactive = demodded, you're hated by the subscribers = demodded.

0
0

[–] Caboose_Calloway ago 

Creating a sub should cost 1000 SCP and the price should increase as voat gets more users.

In the same manner a single downvoat should cost 50 CCP. This would discourage fickle downvoting but there are times when I'd gladly part with 50 CCP for a downvoat.

0
0

[–] randyfox ago 

Well, in light of the news that some of reddit wish to put reddit mods in the position of mods of subverses, it might not be a bad idea. Even if those posts were satire, who's to say that couldn't happen? Having a standard for who can mod, as we do for up and downvoating, sounds reasonable.

0
0

[–] tankfox ago 

I would really like it if they would eliminate tying CCP to site functionality. It effectively cripples the site for new users and makes it really hard to enjoy being here.

0
0

[–] notencore [S] ago 

The only thing that I've found tied to CCP is downvoting, and why would you want to do that on a new account? It makes sense that there are checks and measures for site functionality, and, in my humble opinion, it encourages people to participate in the community.

0
0

[–] totes_magotes ago 

Is there a limit on how many subs you can mod? Per your IP address....

0
2

[–] notencore [S] 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

I'm unsure about per IP address, but I know for sure that per user the limit is ten. I think.

0
0

[–] causuistry ago