[–] SheSaidDestroy [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
I'm not going to assume that it was cannibalism and not going to speak of it as though it is fact. It is a possibility, but we want to avoid speaking like it as though it is fact. This is how the MSM can grab something and be like, "There is a conspiracy theory that CPP puts human parts in their food," despite no evidence, which is then used to make all of us sound crazy/retarded. Let us please try to just focus on what is clearly suspicious and show that we are open to reasonable explanations if they exist.
[–] VieBleu 2 points -2 points 0 points (+0|-2) ago
No assumption required by you. I rephrased my statement, it is a general theorizing type of statement.
I agree it is best to call our ideas about things theorizing, what ifs?, may be's, possibles and allegedly so, as we continue to dig and look at what we find. I do think it is okay to theorize in this manner, as do scientists looking at phenomenon and creating experiements to uncover facts, or police when operating on "hunches".
[–] SheSaidDestroy [S] ago
I agree to an extent. I know I criticize a lot and can come across in a sort of 'holier than thou' kind of way. It is not my intention, though I know I can come across that way. I just want us to be as strategic as possible. I want us to succeed.