1
0

[–] thicktail1730947 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Taking this bottom to top: The "NSA" Tweet in the bottom right was bunk, it never happened. The studies quoted are junk and they post-date by several years the .pps files in question. The examples of suspicious internals via opening with 7zip are an apples to oranges comparison (.pps and .ppsx are different formats which look different when opened as archives by 7zip). The image on the the middle right that's partially censored as "graphic content" is just a sicko playing a prank with censor bars - I think. You cannot steganographically encode gigabytes of files in a few megabytes of image. The sheet of hex code in the image is too small to parse and attached to no explanation; it's just there for the hacker look. The whole first section of the "info"graphic is dense nothing just there for the look - Biden makes steganography legal? Thomas Jefferson quotes? Who cares? And they misspelled classified!

In unrelated news that I discovered while wasting my time on this, the author of the suspicious powerpoint files used a cracked Portuguese copy of Powerpoint to make them.

0
1

[–] Thrrowie 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Lol, someone's been on amphetamine while doing that infographic though ;)

If I get this right, nothing is found yet and this is just an encouragement to keep searching?

2
-1

[–] CJJacobs 2 points -1 points (+1|-2) ago 

Just because somebody made an 'infographic' doesn't mean that it is good, useful, or helps our cause. Sorry.

0
0

[–] reasonedandinformed ago 

Is there a way to succinctly verbally summarize the meaning?

0
1

[–] derpderpderpderp 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

What's the verdict here? What was found in the pizza.jpg stega? Nothing?

2
-2

[–] anonymusthi 2 points -2 points (+0|-2) ago 

I am going to fill everyone in on what's happening here. Several users are dropping information about these "slides" across various forums but archives keep being destroyed and censored almost immediately.

-Slide 13 Macaws should be the easiest for users with basic Photoshop skills to figure out. Turn down the brightness, turn up the contrast, take a step back from your computer and think about it...

0
1

[–] detcmon 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

I am trying and not seeing. More clues, please.

1
-1

[–] Fire_Fly 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

Slide 13 frI'm which PowerPoint? Only 10 slides in Moscow one.

1
-1

[–] anonymusthi 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/53544

Remember it's supposed to be hidden, layered over. It looks like they botched covering part of it. You will need some patience and know-how to get the full image. Don't believe what anyone posts under my main comment unless you see an image... Most people aren't going to be willing to do that if they come up with the correct result. I wouldn't be surprised to see a bunch of "I didn't see anything" comments without actual uploads of contrast/brightness shift attempts.

0
1

[–] Fire_Fly 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Have you seen anything on the Antarctica photos?

0
0

[–] anonymusthi ago 

Only vague indicators. I haven't seen results yet. I remember one with a ship in the middle that had a strange artifact in color adjustments.

0
0

[–] Luxxy ago 

slide 13?????

0
0

[–] Heffter ago 

I've had no time to pursue this line of investigation, if you do, please take a look https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1467142 might. E nothing, might be something...

0
2

[–] Thrash57 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Will it be possible to find out what is hidden with the steganography

load more comments ▼ (8 remaining)